The Effects of Background upon Engineering Design Expertise – A Sino Occidental Comparison

Article Preview

Abstract:

To date the majority of research into engineering design expertise has been done within an occidental context. With an increase in multinational design firms engineers are now more likely to work with engineers of different backgrounds. The authors’ experience in countries other than their own suggested that background can affect design engineers’ thinking and working, and the nature of expertise. This prompted a study (via interviews) into design teams with mixed (by nationality) members. This investigation into occidental and Sino backgrounds and engineering design expertise showed that a Sino background encouraged low risk reliable designs and detailed thinking while an occidental background promoted unique ideas, systemic thinking and the use of objective knowledge. However, individual change and improvement is possible.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

452-467

Citation:

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] N. Cross and A. Clayburn Cross: Research in Engineering Design - Theory, Applications, and Concurrent Engineering Vol. 10 (1998), pp.141-149

Google Scholar

[2] N. P. Suh: The principles of design (Oxford, New York 1990).

Google Scholar

[3] G. Pahl and W. Beitz: Engineering design: A systematic approach. (Springer-Verlag, London 1995).

Google Scholar

[4] B. V. Koen: Definition of the engineering method (American Society for Engineering Education., Washington 1985).

Google Scholar

[5] E. Kroll, S. S. Condoor and D. G. Jansson: Innovative conceptual design: Theory and application of parameter analysis. (Cambridge University Press., Cambridge 2001).

DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511612923

Google Scholar

[6] M. French: Conceptual design for engineers (Springer, London 1999).

Google Scholar

[7] T. Lewis: Journal of research in science teaching Vol. 43 (2006), pp.255-281

Google Scholar

[8] W. Visser: Design Studies Vol. 30 (2009), pp.187-223

Google Scholar

[9] O. Akin, in: Variants in Design Cognition, edited by E. C., W. Newstetter and M. McCracken chapter, 6, Elsevier Science, (2001).

Google Scholar

[10] K. Ehrlenspiel and N. Dylla: Journal of Engineering Design Vol. 4 (1993), p.

Google Scholar

[11] C. J. Atman, R. S. Adams, M. E. Cardella, J. Turns, S. Mosborg and J. Saleem: Journal of Engineering Education Vol. (2007), pp.359-379

DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00945.x

Google Scholar

[12] D. A. Schön: The Refelctive Practioner (Temple-Smith, London 1983).

Google Scholar

[13] N. Cross: Designerly Ways of Knowing (Springer-Verlag, London 2006).

Google Scholar

[14] K. Dorst and N. Cross: Design Studies Vol. 22 (2001), pp.425-437

Google Scholar

[15] E. de Bono: Six Thinking hats (Penguin Books, 1985).

Google Scholar

[16] L. L. Bucciarelli: Design Studies Vol. 9 (1988), pp.159-168

Google Scholar

[17] F. Coley, O. Houseman and R. Roy: Journal of Engineering Design Vol. 18 (2007), pp.311-325

Google Scholar

[18] A. Oak: Design Studies Vol. 32 (2011), pp.211-234

Google Scholar

[19] B. Burns: Introduction to Research Methods (Longman Cheshire, Melbourne 1994).

Google Scholar

[20] L. M. Kiisk: Journal of Constuction Education Vol. 3 (1998), pp.213-222

Google Scholar

[21] M. A. Rhamdhani, K. Salehi, Y. C. Wong and A. Kapoor: proceedings of the 2009 AaeE conference Vol. (2009), p.

Google Scholar

[22] N. Schadewitz: International Journal of Design Vol. 3 (2009), pp.37-53

Google Scholar

[23] S. Daly: Proceedings of the ASEE Conference Vol. (2009), p.

Google Scholar

[24] E. U. Weber and C. K. Hsee: Applied Psychology: An international review Vol. 49 (2000), pp.32-61

Google Scholar

[25] T. Buzan and B. Buzan: The Mind Map Book (BCC Worldwide Limited, London 1993).

Google Scholar

[26] A. M. G.-M. Arce-Ibarra, A.I.: The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences Vol. 2 (2007), pp.39-52

Google Scholar

[27] C. D. Buckingham, A. Adams and C. Mace: Journal of Mental Health Vol. 17 (2008), pp.299-314

Google Scholar

[28] Z. Weize and Q. Feiyue: 2011 International Symposium on IT in Medicine and Education (ITME) Vol. (2011), pp.485-489

Google Scholar

[29] D. Koznov, E. Larchik, M. Pliskin and N. Artamonov: Programming and Computer Software Vol. 37 (2011), p.315–321

DOI: 10.1134/s036176881106003x

Google Scholar

[30] L. L. Bucciarelli: Design Studies Vol. 23 (2002), pp.219-231

Google Scholar

[31] R. E. Nisbett: The geography of thought: How Asians and westerners think differently and why (Free Press, New York 2004).

DOI: 10.1525/ctx.2004.3.1.63

Google Scholar

[32] M. B. Teagarden, J. Meyer and D. Jones: Organizational dynamics Vol. 37 (2008), pp.190-202

Google Scholar

[33] L. D. Rainey: Confucius and Confucianism: The Essentials (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester 2010).

Google Scholar

[34] J. K. Nielsen: Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies Vol. 8 (2010), pp.23-44

Google Scholar

[35] J. F. Yates and J. W. Lee, in: Chinese Decision-making, edited by M. H. Bond chapter, 22, Oxford University Press (China) Ltd, Hong Kong (1996).

Google Scholar

[36] L. Gow, J. Balla, D. Kember and K. T. Hau, in: The learning approaches of Chinese people: A function of socializayion processes and the context of learning?, edited by M. H. Bond chapter, 8, Oxford University Press (China) ltd, Hong Kong (1996).

Google Scholar

[37] D. P. S. Bhawuk: Progress in Development Studies Vol. 21 (2009), pp.161-181

Google Scholar