Inverse Design of Air-to-Air Missile System Based on Improved Genetic Algorithm

Article Preview

Abstract:

The inverse design of air-to-air missile system was researched according to its target performance database. Firstly the initial model and database of air-to-air missile were set based on a foregone and similar missile model which includes the database of aerodynamic coefficients, engine performance, mass properties, guidance law and so on. Then this initial model and database were optimally modified by using the improved elitist preserved genetic algorithm and flight simulation based on the 4-D motion differential equations of both the air-to-air missile and target vehicle. The inverse design algorithm globally minimized the performance errors which were obtained from the inversely designed envelopes compared with the desired target performance database of maximum intercept envelope and the maximum impossible escape (no-escape) envelope. The optimized numerical simulation results of inverse design are showing that both the average error and the maximum error of missile envelopes are very small and can be acceptable, which verified that the inverse design algorithm of system is high accuracy and reliable.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

302-314

Citation:

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Thomas R. Barrett, Neil W. Bressloff, and Andy J. Keane, Airfoil Shape Design and Optimization Using Multifidelity Analysis and Embedded Inverse Design, AIAA JOURNAL Vol. 44, No. 9, September (2006).

DOI: 10.2514/1.18766

Google Scholar

[2] Jeffrey K. Jepson and Ashok Gopalarathnam, Incorporation of Aircraft Performance Considerations in Inverse Airfoil Design, JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT Vol. 42, No. 1, January–February (2005).

DOI: 10.2514/1.5373

Google Scholar

[3] Jae-Woo Lee , Young-Ki Lee, and Yung-Hwan Byun, Design of Space Launch Vehicle Using Numerical Optimization and Inverse Method, JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, Vol. 38, No. 2, March–April (2001).

DOI: 10.2514/2.3672

Google Scholar

[4] S. Ganesh and B. V. S. S. S. Prasad, Iterative Inverse Design Method with AUSM+-Up Scheme Implemented on Unstructured Grids, J OURNAL OF P ROPULSION AND P OWER Vol. 28, No. 1, January–February (2012).

DOI: 10.2514/1.56777

Google Scholar

[5] Abdurrahman Hacioglu, Fast Evolutionary Algorithm for Airfoil Design via Neural Network, AIAA JOURNAL, Vol. 45, No. 9, September (2007).

DOI: 10.2514/1.24484

Google Scholar

[6] Alejandro C. Limache, Inverse Shape Design of Deformable Structures and Deformable Wings, J OURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, Vol. 48, No. 1, January–February (2011).

DOI: 10.2514/1.c001007

Google Scholar

[7] HUANG GuoQiang, LU YuPing. NAN Ying, A survey of numerical algorithms for trajectory optimization of flight vehicles, Science China, Vol. 55, (2012).

DOI: 10.1007/s11431-012-4946-y

Google Scholar

[8] Jenn-Long Liu, Intelligent Genetic Algorithm and Its Application to Aerodynamic Optimization of Airplanes, AIAA JOURNAL, Vol. 43, No. 3, March (2005).

DOI: 10.2514/1.7070

Google Scholar

[9] Jennifer Davis, Mario G. Perhinschi, and Hever Moncayo, Evolutionary Algorithm for Arti fi cial-Immune-System-Based Failure-Detector Generation and Optimization, J OURNAL OF GUIDANCE, CONTROL , ANDDYNAMICS, Vol. 33, No. 2, March – April (2010).

DOI: 10.2514/6.2009-5891

Google Scholar

[10] Huang GuoQiang, Nan Ying, Lu YuPing, Calculation of All-Aspect Attack Envelope for Air-to-Air Missile Merge, Journal of Ballistics, Vol. 23, No. 2, June (2011).

Google Scholar