Multi-Axle Moving Train Loads Identification on Continuous Bridge from Bridge Displacement Responses

Article Preview

Abstract:

A new method for multi-axle moving train loads identification on continuous bridge is presented in this paper. In order to improve the accuracy and efficiency for moving loads identification, both cubic spline interpolation technique and dynamic displacement influence line technique were employed. The time history displacements of the measurement stations under unit force were calculated with cubic spline interpolation technique based on the finite element model of the bridge. The dynamic displacement influence line was obtained to be used for identifying the moving train loads with simulated annealing genetic algorithm by minimizing the errors between the measured displacements and the reconstructed displacements from the moving train loads. A series of comparative studies were carried out to investigate effects of different span numbers with the same length, different length with the same span number and measurement noise on the proposed method. The result shows that the proposed method is an accurate and efficient method for multi-axle moving train loads identification on continuous bridge.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

670-674

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D. Cebon, Symposium on Heavy Vehicle Suspension and Characteristics, (1987), pp.199-212.

Google Scholar

[2] F. Moses, J. Transport Eng (ASCE). 105 (1978) 233-249.

Google Scholar

[3] R. Cantineni, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Mate-rials Testing and Research(EMPA), (1992), p.240.

Google Scholar

[4] O'Connor and T.H.T. Chan, J. Struct. Eng, ASCE. 114 (1988) 1703-1723.

Google Scholar

[5] T.H.T. Chan, L. Yu, S.S. Law and T.H. Yung, J. Sound Vib. 247(1) (2001) 59-76.

Google Scholar

[6] T.H.T. Chan, L. Yu, S.S. Law and T.H. Yung, J. Sound Vib. 247(1) (2001) 77-95.

Google Scholar

[7] L. Yu and T.H.T. Chan, J. Sound Vib. 305 (2007) 3-21.

Google Scholar

[8] S.S. Law, J.Q. Bu, X.Q. Zhu and S.L. Chan, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 49 (2007) 1262-1275.

Google Scholar

[9] L. Yu and T.H.T. Chan, J. Sound Vib. 261 (2003) 329-349.

Google Scholar

[10] L. Yu, T.H. T Chan and J.H. Zhu, Struct. Eng. Mech. 29(2) (2008) 135-154.

Google Scholar

[11] L. Yu, T.H. T Chan and J.H. Zhu, Struct. Eng. Mech. 29(2) (2008) 155-169.

Google Scholar

[12] F.T.K. Au , R.J. Jiang and Y.K. Cheung, J. Sound Vib. 269 (2004) 94-111.

Google Scholar

[13] R.J. Jiang, F.T.K. Au and Y.K. Cheung, J. Sound Vib. 274 (2004) 1045-1063.

Google Scholar

[14] W. L. Qu, Y. Wang and Y.L. Pi, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 11(1) (2010) 57-71.

Google Scholar

[15] Y. Wang and W. L. Qu, Int. J. Steel Struct. 11(2) (2011) 109-115.

Google Scholar