Aspects of Uncertainty Analysis for Large Nonlinear Computational Models

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper concerns the analysis of how uncertainty propagates through large computational models like finite element models. If a model is expensive to run, a Monte Carlo approach based on sampling over the possible model inputs will not be feasible, because the large number of model runs will be prohibitively expensive. Fortunately, an alternative to Monte Carlo is available in the form of the established Bayesian algorithm discussed here; this algorithm can provide information about uncertainty with many less model runs than Monte Carlo requires. The algorithm also provides information regarding sensitivity to the inputs i.e. the extent to which input uncertainties are responsible for output uncertainty. After describing the basic principles of the Bayesian approach, it is illustrated via two case studies: the first concerns a finite element model of a human heart valve and the second, an airship model incorporating fluid structure interaction.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

[1] G.J. Klir, and R.M. Smith: Annals of Mathematics of Artificial Intelligence Vol. 32 (2001) pp.5-33.

Google Scholar

[2] I. Elishakoff, and Y. Ren: Finite Element Methods for Structures with Large Stochastic Variations (Oxford Texts in Applied and Engineering Mathematics, 2003).

Google Scholar

[3] B. Lallemand, A. Cherki, T. Tison and P. Level; Journal of Sound and Vibration Vol. 220 pp.353-364.

Google Scholar

[4] A. O'Hagan and J.E. Oakley; Reliability Engineering and System Safety Vol. 85 (2004) pp.239-248.

Google Scholar

[5] Y.A. Shreider; Method of Statistical Testing: Monte Carlo Method (Elsevier, Amsterdam; London, (1964).

Google Scholar

[6] C.M. Bishop; Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Springer-Verlag, 2007).

Google Scholar

[7] A. Saltelli, K. Chan and E.M. Scott; Sensitivity Analysis (Wiley, New York, 2000).

Google Scholar

[8] J.E. Oakley, and A. O'Hagan; Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B Vol. 66 (2004) p.751769.

Google Scholar

[9] M.C. Kennedy, C.W. Anderson, S. Conti and A. O'Hagan; Reliability Engineering and System Safety Vol. 91 (2006) pp.1301-1309.

Google Scholar

[10] C.E. Rasmussen and C.K.I. Williams; Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (MIT Press, 2006).

Google Scholar

[11] Gem-SA Homepage. http: /ctcd. group. shef. ac. uk/gem. html (accessed: 27/03/10).

Google Scholar

[12] T. Homma and A.K. Saltelli; Reliability Engineering and System Safety Vol. 52 (1996) pp.1-17.

Google Scholar

[13] M. Thubrikar; The Aortic Valve (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 1990).

Google Scholar

[14] A. Ranga, R. Mongrain, R. Mendes Galaz, Y. Biadillah and R. Cartier; Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology Vol. 28 (2004) pp.95-103.

DOI: 10.1080/0309190042000193847

Google Scholar

[15] J. De Hart, G.W. Peters, P.J. Schreurs, and F.P. Baaijens; Journal of Biomechanics Vol. 36 (2003) pp.103-112.

Google Scholar

[16] C.J. Carmody, G. Burriesei, I.C. Howard and E.A. Patterson; Journal of Biomechanics Vol. 39 (2006) pp.158-169.

Google Scholar

[17] W. Becker, J. Rowson, J. Oakley, A. Yoxall, G. Manson and K. Worden; in Proceedings of 23 rd International Conference on 7oise and Vibration Engineering, Leuven (2008) on CD.

Google Scholar

[18] I. Vesely, D. Boughner and T. Song; Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 46 (1988) pp.302-308.

Google Scholar

[19] R.J. Brewer, J.D. Deck, B. Capati and S.P. Nolan; Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol. 72 (1976) pp.413-417.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(19)40069-x

Google Scholar

[20] M. Battipede and P.A. Gili; Peculiar Performance of a 7ew Lighter-Than-Air Platform for Monitoring, 2004 Aviation Technology, Integration and Operation Forum, Chicago, IL - USA, September (2004).

DOI: 10.2514/6.2004-6448

Google Scholar

[21] W.E. Becker, K. Worden, M. Battipede and C. Surace; Submitted to AIAA Journal (2010).

Google Scholar

[22] A. Cappadona; Analisi Strutturale su Dirigible 7on Convenzionale a Controllo Remoto: Configurazione Esoscheletro, in Facoltà di Ingegneria, Politecnico di Torino (2008).

Google Scholar

[23] Defense, U.S.D. o., Polymer Matrix Composites Material Properties, in Composite Materials Handbook. (2002).

Google Scholar

[24] EASA, Certification Specifications for 7ormal, Utility, Aerobatic and Commuter Category Aeroplanes CS23, Book 1, E.A.S. Agency, Editor. (2009).

Google Scholar

[25] J. Donea, A. Huerta, J. -Ph. Ponthot and A. Rodriguez-Ferran; Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian Methods, in Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics, E. Stein, R. De Borts, T.J. R Hughes (Eds. ) (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2004).

DOI: 10.1002/0470091355.ecm009

Google Scholar

[26] J.O. Hallquist; LS-Dyna Theory Manual (Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2006).

Google Scholar