The Influence of Cultural Factors on the Adoption of E-Learning: A Reference to a Public University in Sri Lanka

Article Preview

Abstract:

The study investigated the factors influencing e-learning adoption behavior of instructors of a public university in Sri Lanka. The analysis of various models used to study the adoption behavior reveals that cultural factors were neglected. Therefore an e-learning adoption model was proposed considering cultural factors and the model was tested among instructors. The findings of this research have significant effects on the suitability of adopting an e-learning system at this university. However it is recommended that this study should be extended to include instructors belonging to multi-ethnic groups in all universities in Sri Lanka.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3424-3434

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S. Appana, A review of benefits and limitations of online learning in the context of the student, the instructor and the tenured faculty, International Journal on E-Learning, 7 (2008) 5-22.

Google Scholar

[2] N. Vaughan, Perspectives on blended learning in higher education, International Journal on E-Learning, 6 (2007) 81-94.

Google Scholar

[3] H. Mahdizadeh, H. Biemans and M, Mulder, Determining factors of the use of e-learning environments by university teachers, Computers & Education, 51 (2008) 142-154.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.04.004

Google Scholar

[4] A. Bhattacherjee and C, Sanford, Influence processes for information technology acceptance: An elaboration likelihood model, MIS Quarterly, 30 (2006) 805-825.

DOI: 10.2307/25148755

Google Scholar

[5] D. W. Straud, The effect of culture in IT diffusion: E-mail and Fax in Japan and the U.S, Information Systems Research, 5 (1994) 23-47.

Google Scholar

[6] G. Rose and D.W. Straud, Predicting general IT use: Applying TAM to the Arabic World, Journal of Global Information Management, 6 (1998) 39-46.

DOI: 10.4018/jgim.1998070104

Google Scholar

[7] F. D. Davis, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, 13 (1989) 319-340.

DOI: 10.2307/249008

Google Scholar

[8] M. Fishbein and I. Ajzen, Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1980.

Google Scholar

[9] F. D. David, R. Bagozzi, and P.R. Warshaw, User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science, 35 (1989) 982-1003.

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982

Google Scholar

[10] I. Ajzen, Attitudes, personality, and behavior, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, 1988.

Google Scholar

[11] I. Ajzen, The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (1991) 179-211.

DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t

Google Scholar

[12] P. Y. K. Chau and P.J.H. Hu, Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: An exploratory study, Journal of Management Information Systems, 18 (2002) 191-229.

DOI: 10.1080/07421222.2002.11045699

Google Scholar

[13] W. H. Cooper and A.J Richarson, Unfair comparisons, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 71 (1986) 179-184.

Google Scholar

[14] P. Legris, J. Ingham and P. Collerette, Why do people use Information Technology? A Critical review of the technology acceptance mode, Information & Management, 40 (2003) 191-204.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4

Google Scholar

[15] I. Baenbasat and H, Barki, Quo Vadis, TAM, Journal of the AIS, 8 (2007) 211-218.

Google Scholar

[16] V. Venkatesh, M.G. Morris, G.B. Davis and F.D. Davis, User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view, MIS Quarterly, 27 (2003) 425-478.

DOI: 10.2307/30036540

Google Scholar

[17] L. K. Schaper and G.P. Pervan, A model of information and communication technology acceptance and utilization by occupational therapists, International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76, (2007) 790-800.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.05.028

Google Scholar

[18] M. Fusilier, S. Durlabhji and A. Cucchi, An investigation of the integrated model of user technology acceptance: Internet user samples in four countries, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38 (2008) 155-182.

DOI: 10.2190/ec.38.2.c

Google Scholar

[19] K. Bandyopadhyay and K.A. Fraccastoro, The effect of culture on user acceptance of information technology, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 19 (2007) 522-543.

DOI: 10.17705/1cais.01923

Google Scholar

[20] A. H. Moghadam and P. Assar, The Relationship between national culture and E-Adoption: A Case study of Iran, American Journal of Applied Sciences, 5 (2008) 369-377.

DOI: 10.3844/ajassp.2008.369.377

Google Scholar

[21] I. P. L. Png, B.C.Y. Yan and K.L Wee, Dimensions of national culture and corporate adoption of IT infrastructure, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48 (2001) 36-45.

DOI: 10.1109/17.913164

Google Scholar

[22] B. C. Y. Tan, R.T. Watson and K.K. Wei, National culture and group support systems: Filtering communication to dampen power differentials, European Journal of Information Systems, 4(1995) 82-92.

DOI: 10.1057/ejis.1995.10

Google Scholar

[23] D. W. Straud, The effect of culture in IT diffusion: E-mail and Fax in Japan and the U.S, Information Systems Research, 5 (1994) 23-47.

Google Scholar

[24] G. Hofstede, Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind, McGraw-Hill, London, 1991.

Google Scholar

[25] M. Sondergaard, Research Note: Hofstede's consequences: A study of reviews, citations and replications, organization studies, 15 (1994) 447-456.

DOI: 10.1177/017084069401500307

Google Scholar

[26] B. J. Corbitt, K.J. Peszynski, S. Inthanond, B. Hill and T. Thanasakit, Cultural differences, Information and Code Systems, Journal of Global Information Management, 15 (2004) 65-85.

DOI: 10.4018/jgim.2004070104

Google Scholar

[27] A. B. Zakour, Cultural differences and information technology acceptance, Annual Conference of the South Association for Information Systems, Georgia, USA, 2004.

Google Scholar

[28] S. N. Nwabueze, P.N. Meso, V.W. Mbarika, M. Kifle, C. Okoli and M. Chustz, The effects of culture of adoption of telemedicine in medically underserved communities, proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2009.

DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2009.430

Google Scholar

[29] S. J. Barnes and S.L, Huff, Rising sun: iMode and the wireless Internet, Communications of the AIS, 46 (2003) 79-84.

DOI: 10.1145/948383.948384

Google Scholar

[30] R. C. King, and M.L. Gribbins, Internet technology adoption as an organizational event: An exploratory study across industries, Proceedings of 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002.

DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2002.994205

Google Scholar

[31] C. Russell, A systemic framework for managing e-learning adoption in campus universities: Individual strategies in context, ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, 17 (2009) 3-19.

DOI: 10.1080/09687760802649871

Google Scholar

[32] G. Premkumar and M. Robert, Adoption of new technologies in rural small business, The International Journal of Management Science (OMEGA), 27 (1999) 467-484.

DOI: 10.1016/s0305-0483(98)00071-1

Google Scholar

[33] C. L. Ang, M.A. Davies and P.N Finaly, An empirical model of IT usage in the Malaysian public sector, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 10 (2001) 159-174.

DOI: 10.1016/s0963-8687(01)00047-6

Google Scholar

[34] R. Hussein, The contribution of organisational, technological and individual factors in information system success in Malaysian public sectors, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University Putra Malaysia, 2005.

Google Scholar

[35] T. Ramayah and Y. Eri, Explaining intention to use enterprise resources planning (ERP) using the technology acceptance model (TAM), Proceedings of IAMOT 14th International Conference on Management of Technology, Vienna, Austria, 2005.

Google Scholar

[36] R. Hussein, M.H. Selamat and N.S.A. Karim, The impact of organizational factors on Information success in the electronic government context, proceedings of the second international conference on Innovations on information technology, Dubai, UAE, 2005.

Google Scholar

[37] N. Schillewaert, M.J. Ahearne, R.T Frambach and R.K. Moenaert, The adoption of information technology in the sales force, Industrial Marketing Management, 34 (2005) 323-336.

DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.09.013

Google Scholar

[38] S. Y. Hung, C.C. Chen and W.J. Lee, Moving hospitals toward e-learning adoption: an empirical investigation, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22 (2009) 239-256.

DOI: 10.1108/09534810910951041

Google Scholar

[39] S. McCoy, D.F. Galletta and W.R King, Integrating national culture into IS research: The need for current individual-level measures, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15 (2005) 211-224.

DOI: 10.17705/1cais.01512

Google Scholar

[40] P. W. Dorfman and J.P Howell, Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited, Advances in International Comparative Management, 3 (1988) 127-150.

Google Scholar

[41] B. G. Tabachinick, and L.S. Fidell, Using multivariate analysis, Harper & Row, New York, 1983.

Google Scholar

[42] J. O. Nunnally, Psychometric theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.

Google Scholar

[43] J. Pallant, SPSS Survival Manual, McGraw-Hill, England, 2007.

Google Scholar