Flexural-Torsional Buckling of Double-Angle Compression Members

Article Preview

Abstract:

The evaluation for double-angle compression members is a tedious procedure and is not an easy task for practicing engineers. In this study, a computer program has been developed to calculate the Pu based on the AISC specifications. It is found that the calculated value is quite close to the tabulated one if effective length (KL) is longer than 10 feet. However, the Pu is not tabulated for effective length less than 10 feet in some lager sections. It is found that the differences between the calculated value and the interpolated value could be as much as 20%. Unfortunately, the difference errors are not on conservative side and the use of interpolated values is not acceptable in practice. This study evaluates all double-angle compressive formulas provided by the AISC manuals and the comparisons among them are presented. The Pu versus KL curves, in which effective lengths less than 10 feet are added and plotted. Some supplementary tabulated values, which required in routine design and not listed in current AISC design manuals, are also furnished. This study will fulfill the needs for those who seek higher performance and wider coverage when evaluating the design of double-angle compression members under flexural-torsion condition.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1334-1339

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] F. Bleich: Buckling Strength of Metal Structures (McGraw-Hill, New York 1952).

Google Scholar

[2] AISC-LRFD: Load and Resistance Factor Design Specifications for Structural Steel Buildings, First edition (American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., Chicago, Illinois, 1986).

Google Scholar

[3] A. Astaneh-Asl, S.C. Goel, and R.D. Hanson: Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 111, (1985), p.1135.

Google Scholar

[4] F. Aslani and S. C. Goel: Engineering Journal, AISC, Vol28, (1991), p.159.

Google Scholar

[5] S. Timoshenko, and J. M. Gere: Theory of Elasticity Stability, 3rd Edition ( Mc Graw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1991).

Google Scholar

[6] AISC-LRFD: Load and Resistance Factor Design Specifications for Structural Steel Buildings, Second Edition (American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., Chicago, Illinois, 1993).

Google Scholar

[7] AISC-LRFD: Load and Resistance Factor Design Specifications for Structural Steel Buildings, Second Edition (American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., Chicago, Illinois, 1993).

Google Scholar

[8] B. G. Johnston: Guide to Stability Design Criteria for Metal Structures, Third Edition (Structural Stability Research Council, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, USA, 1976).

Google Scholar

[9] C.G. Salmon and J. E. Johnson: Steel Structures, 2nd Edition (Harper & Row, Publishers, New York, 1980).

Google Scholar

[10] AISC-ASD: Allowable Stress Design Specifications for Structural Steel Buildings, Ninth Edition (American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., Chicago, Illinois, 1989).

Google Scholar

[11] AISC: Steel Construction Manuals, Thirteenth Edition (American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., Chicago, Illinois, 2005).

Google Scholar

[12] AISC-LRFD: Load and Resistance Factor Design Specifications for Structural Steel Buildings, Third Edition (American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., Chicago, Illinois, 1999).

Google Scholar