Effects of an Extended Amphipathic Helix on Intermolecular Interactions and Self-Assembly of Peptides via Pulsed Field Gradient Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

Article Preview

Abstract:

Intermolecular interactions are of fundamental importance to fully comprehend the formation mechanism of a nanostructure created by peptides. Four peptides, segmented from human neuropeptide Y (hNPY), were synthesized in this work to study the interaction between species. Information about intermolecular interactions was extracted from their self-assembly behaviors. The results from pulsed field gradient NMR data revealed that one of the peptides may undergo a more favorable self-assembly as temperature was increased, while other three peptides were found to form larger self-assemblies at lower temperatures and continuously dissociate into the monomeric form with increasing temperature. We characterized the changes of the oligomeric states with respect to temperature to infer the effects of entropy and interacting energetics on the self-assembly behavior. We demonstrated that an extended C-terminal helix may improve the binding of TFE, and as a result, entropy is gained via the transfer of the TFE cluster from the interface between monomeric peptides into the bulk solvent. This observation suggests that the self-assembly behavior may be modulated by the entropy and the energetics contributed by the helical segments in a self-assembly process.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

300-304

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. Cui, M.J. Webber and S.I. Stupp: Biopolymers (Peptide Science) 94 (2010), p.1.

Google Scholar

[2] A.S. Altieri, D.P. Hilton and R.A. Byrd: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117 (1995), p.7566.

Google Scholar

[3] A.J. Dingley, J.P. Mackay, B.E. Chapman, M.B. Morris, P.W. Kuchel, B.D. Hambly and G.F. King: J. Biomol. NMR 6 (1995), p.321.

Google Scholar

[4] E. Ilyina, V. Roongta, H. Pan, C. Woodward and K.H. Mayo: Biochemistry 36 (1997), p.3383.

Google Scholar

[5] S. Yao, G.J. Howlett and R.S. Norton: J. Biomol. NMR 16 (2000), p.109.

Google Scholar

[6] K. Tatemoto, M. Carlquist and V. Mutt: Nature 296 (1982), p.659.

Google Scholar

[7] R. Bader, A. Bettio, A.G. Beck-Sickinger and O. Zerbe: J. Mol. Biol. 305 (2001), p.307.

Google Scholar

[8] C. Cabrele and A.G. Beck-Sickinger: J. Pept. Sci. 6 (2000), p.97.

Google Scholar

[9] D.J. Cowley, J.M. Hoflack, J.T. Pelton and V. Saudek: Eur. J. Biochem. 205 (1992), p.1099.

Google Scholar

[10] M. Lerch, H. Kamimori, G. Folkers, M.I. Aguilar, A.G. Beck-Sickinger and O. Zerbe: Biochemistry 44 (2005), p.9255.

DOI: 10.2210/pdb1tz4/pdb

Google Scholar

[11] M. Lerch, M. Mayrhofer and O. Zerbe: J. Mol. Biol. 339 (2004), p.1153.

Google Scholar

[12] S. Xiao, C. Wang, J. Li and F. Li: J. Pept. Sci. 17 (2011), p.505.

Google Scholar

[13] C.M. Othon, O.H. Kwon, M.M. Lin and A.H. Zewail: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 (2009), p.12593.

Google Scholar

[14] P. Luo and R. L Baldwin: Biochemistry 36 (1997), p.8413.

Google Scholar

[15] C.A. Rohl and R.L. Baldwin: Biochemistry 36 (1997), p.8435.

Google Scholar

[16] V.V. Krishnan: J. Magn. Reson. 124 (1997), p.468.

Google Scholar

[17] C.E. MacPhee, M.A. Perugini, W.H. Sawyer and G.J. Howlett: FEBS Lett. 416 (1997), p.265.

Google Scholar

[18] S. Yao, G.J. Howlett and R. S Norton: J. Biomol. NMR 16 (2000), p.109.

Google Scholar

[19] M. Fioroni, M.D. Diaz, K. Burger and S. Berger: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (2002), p.7737.

Google Scholar

[20] C.M. Roth, B.L. Neal and A.M. Lenhoff: Biophys. J. 70 (1996), p.977.

Google Scholar