Estimation of Distribution Algorithms with Matrix Transpose in Bayesian Learning

Article Preview

Abstract:

Estimation of distribution algorithms (EDAs) constitute a new branch of evolutionary optimization algorithms, providing effective and efficient optimization performance in a variety of research areas. Recent studies have proposed new EDAs that employ mutation operators in standard EDAs to increase the population diversity. We present a new mutation operator, a matrix transpose, specifically designed for Bayesian structure learning, and we evaluate its performance in Bayesian structure learning. The results indicate that EDAs with transpose mutation give markedly better performance than conventional EDAs.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3093-3096

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. Armananzas, et al.: BioData Mining Vol. 1 (2008), p.1

Google Scholar

[2] H. Miihlenbein: Evolutionary Computation Vol. 5 (1998), p.303

Google Scholar

[3] S. Baluja: Population-Based Incremental Learning: A Method for Integrating Genetic Search Based Function Optimization and Competitive Learning. Carnegie Mellon University, (1994)

Google Scholar

[4] G.R. Harik, F.G. Lobo, and D.E. Goldberg: IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation Vol. 3 (1999), p.287

Google Scholar

[5] J.S. De Bonet, C.L. Isbell, and P. Viola: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems Vol. 9 (1997), p.424

Google Scholar

[6] R. Roy, T. Furuhashi, and P.K. Chandhory: Advances in Soft Computing Engineering Design and Manufacturing (Springer-Verlag, 1999)

Google Scholar

[7] S. Baluja and S. Davies: Proc. of the 14th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning (1997), p.30

Google Scholar

[8] G. Harik: Technical Report 99010, IlliGAL, 1999.

Google Scholar

[9] M. Pelikan, et al.: Evolutionary Computation Vol. 8 (2000), 311

Google Scholar

[10] R.E. Neapolitan: Learning Bayesian Networks (Prentice Hall, 2004)

Google Scholar

[11] D. Koller and N. Friedman: Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques (The MIT Press, 2009)

Google Scholar

[12] R. Blanco, I. Inza, and P. Larranaga: Int. J. of Intelligent Systems Vol. 18 (2003), p.205

Google Scholar

[13] T. Romero, P. Larranaga, and B. Sierra: International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence Vol. 18 (2004), p.607

Google Scholar

[14] H. Handa: Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 3448 (2005), p.112

Google Scholar

[15] T. Gosling, N. Jin, and E. Tsang: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (2005), p.958

Google Scholar

[16] E.M. Heien, N. Fujimoto, and T. Hiroyasu: Proc. of the 9th Annual Conf. on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (2007)

Google Scholar

[17] M. Pelikan and K. Sastry: U. of Missouri--St. Louise, MEDAL Report No. 2009001 (2009)

Google Scholar

[18] Z. Michalewicz and D.B. Fogel: How to Solve it: Modern Heuristics (Springer, 2004)

Google Scholar

[19] J.W. Smith, et al.: Proc. of the Sym. on Computer Applications and Medical Care (1998), p.261

Google Scholar

[20] S.L. Lauritzen and D.J. Speigelhalter: J. of the Royal Stat. Soc.(B) Vol. 50 (1988), p.157

Google Scholar