Enhanced Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Optimal Unit Commitment Problem

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper applies the enhanced particle swarm optimization (EPSO) algorithm to solve the unit commitment problem, and compares the results obtained against previous work. EPSO can improve the search quality and also generate a better result through optimization, because ants produced randomly by the pheromone process are not necessary better. The proposed model uses combined carbon finance and spot market formulation, and help energy produces decide when these commitments could be beneficial.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3087-3092

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] K. Bhattacharya, Strategic bidding and generation scheduling in electricity spot-markets, Proc. on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies, 1(2000), 108-113.

DOI: 10.1109/drpt.2000.855647

Google Scholar

[2] I. Kockar, Unit commitment for combined pool/bilateral markets with emissions trading, 2008 IEEE 21st PES General Meeting-Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy, 1(2008), 1-9.

DOI: 10.1109/pes.2008.4596918

Google Scholar

[3] S. Kuloor, G. Hope, O. Malik, Environmentally constrained unit commitment, IEE Proceedings - C, 139(1992), No. 2, 122-128.

DOI: 10.1049/ip-c.1992.0020

Google Scholar

[4] S. Wang, M. Shahidehpour, D. S. Kirschen, S. Mokhtari, G. Irissari, Short-Term Generation Scheduling with Transmission and Environmental Constraints Using an Augmented Lagrangian Relaxation, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 10(1995), No. 3, 1294-1300.

DOI: 10.1109/59.466524

Google Scholar

[5] T. Gjengedal, Emission Constrained Unit Commitment (ECUC), IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 11(1996), No. 1, 132-138.

DOI: 10.1109/60.486587

Google Scholar

[6] H. Y. Yamin, Q. E. Dwairi, S. M. Shahidehpour, A new approach for GenCos profit based unit commitment in day-ahead competitive electricity market considering reserve uncertainty, International Journal on Electrical Power Energy Systems, 29(2007), No. 8,609-616.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2006.09.004

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Fu, S. M. Shahidehpour, Z. Li, Long-term Security Constrained Unit Commitment: Hybrid Dantzig-Wolfe Decomposition and Subgradient Approach, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 20(2005), No. 4, 2093-2106.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2005.857286

Google Scholar

[8] O. Alsac, B. Stott, , Optimal load flow with steady state security, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-93(1974), 745-751.

DOI: 10.1109/tpas.1974.293972

Google Scholar

[9] J. Yuryevich, K. P. Wong, Evolutionary programming based optimal power flow algorithm, IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, 14 (1999), 1245-1250.

DOI: 10.1109/59.801880

Google Scholar

[10] K. P. Wong, C. C. Fung, Simulated annealing based economic dispatch algorithm, Proc. Inst. Elect. Eng. C, 140(1993), 509-515.

Google Scholar

[11] S. J. Huang, An Immune-Based Optimization Method to Capacitor Placement in a Radial Distribution System, IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, 15(2000), No. 2,744-479.

DOI: 10.1109/61.853014

Google Scholar

[12] M. A. Abido, Optimal power flow using particle swarm optimization, Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 24(2002), 563-571.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-0615(01)00067-9

Google Scholar

[13] G. B. Sheble, G. N. Fahd, Unit commitment literature synopsis, IEEE Trans. Power Systems, 9(1994), 28-135.

DOI: 10.1109/59.317549

Google Scholar

[14] D. Kirschen, G. Strbac, Fundamentals of Power System Economics, John Wiley&Sons, Ltd. (2004).

Google Scholar

[15] R. Caponetto, L. Fortuna, S. Fazzino, M. Xibilia, Chaotic sequences to improve the performance of evolutionary algorithms, IEEE Trans. On Evolutionary Computation, 7(2003), 289-304.

DOI: 10.1109/tevc.2003.810069

Google Scholar

[16] P. Attaviriyanupap, H. Kita, E. Tanaka, J. Hasegawa, A New Profit-Based Unit Commitment Considering Power and Reserve Generating, 2002 IEEE PES Winter Meeting, 2 (2002), 1311-1316

DOI: 10.1109/pesw.2002.985227

Google Scholar