Neural - Wiener Model for Multivariable Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) Reactive Distillation

Article Preview

Abstract:

MTBE is a chemical that can be used as anti-knock additive to replace lead additive (tetra ethyl lead) which can be efficiently produced using reactive distillation process. It has been established in the literature that MTBE reactive distillation poses a highly nonlinear behavior due to the combination of reaction and separation processes. A reliable model for predicting the behavior is required especially for the control purposes. In this work, a Neural Wiener model which is one of the available types of oriented block model was utilised to develop the MTBE reactive distillation model. The required data for the Neural Wiener model were generated using a validated Aspen dynamics model for the MTBE reactive distillation process. It is found that the Neural Wiener model is capable to predict the MTBE purity and isobutene conversion with accuracy of 98.55% and 96.95%, respectively. Those values are quantitatively better in comparison to the state space model which gives lower values for prediction accuracy of 87.86% and 82.90%, respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

409-413

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] N. Sharma and K.Singh: Int. J. Chemical Reactor Eng. Vol. 8 (2010), R5

Google Scholar

[2] E. VanSonnenberg, A. F. Hofmann, J. Neoptolemus, G. R. Wittich, R.A. Princenthal, S.W. Willson: AJR Vol. 146 (1986),p.865

DOI: 10.2214/ajr.146.4.865

Google Scholar

[3] J. Labovsky, Z. Svandova, J. Markos, L. Jelemensky: J. Loss Prevention in the Process Industries Vol. 20 (2007), p.230–237

Google Scholar

[4] A. P. Higler, R. Taylor and R. Krishna: Chem. Eng. Science, 54( 1999),p.2873

Google Scholar

[5] M. M. Arefi, A. Montazeri, J. Poshtan and M. R. J. Motlagh: Chem. Eng. J. Vol. 138 (2008), p.274

Google Scholar

[6] M. Lawry´nczuk: Neurocomputing Vol. 74 (2010), p.401

Google Scholar

[7] G. Shafiee, A. A. Arefi, M. R. J. Motlagh and A. A. Jalali: Chem. Eng. J. Vol. 143 (2008), p.282

Google Scholar

[8] M. Lawry´nczuk: ISMIS 2011, LNAI 6804 (2011), p.663

Google Scholar

[9] M. Lawry´nczuk and P.Tatjewski: ICAISC 2006, LNAI 4029 (2006), p.76

Google Scholar

[10] M. Lawry´nczuk: AIMSA 2008, LNAI 5253 (2008), p.410

Google Scholar

[11] R.K. Al Seyab, Y. Cao: J. Process Contr.16 (2006), p.795

Google Scholar

[12] R. Jacobs and R. Krishna: Ind. and Eng. Chemistry Res. 32 (1993), p.1706

Google Scholar

[13] W. L. Luyben: J. Process Contr. Vol. 16 (2006), p.115

Google Scholar

[14] M. Lawry´nczuk: ICANNGA 2011, Part I, LNCS 6593 (2011), p.230

Google Scholar