Analysis of NO Formation in Counterflow Premixed Hydrogen-Air Flame

Article Preview

Abstract:

Though hydrogen fuel reduces the carbon dioxide emission, it still produces NOx. However, gaps exist in the fundamental understanding of hydrogen-air combustion and the NO emission; most previous research has focused on the flames burning with mixture such as H2 mixed with CH4, rather than pure H2 flame. Here, a computational study is presented to investigate the effects of stretch rate on NO formation in counter-flow premixed hydrogen-air flame. The simulations of premixed hydrogen flames were performed with OPPDIF code with UCSD chemical mechanism. Results indicate that the NO formation is affected by three factors: radical concentration, flame temperature, and residence time of reactants. The flame temperature, the reaction rate of NO, and the NO emission index all decrease when the stretch rate increases. Moreover, the formation of NO through thermal mechanism, NNH mechanism, and N2O mechanism are discussed, as well as the percentages of their contribution.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

601-607

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C. Law and C. Sung, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 26 459-505 (2000).

Google Scholar

[2] M. Skottene and K.E. Rian, Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy, 32 3572-3585 (2007).

Google Scholar

[3] A. Frassoldati, T. Faravelli and E. Ranzi, Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy, 31 2310-2328 (2006).

Google Scholar

[4] H. Guo, G.J. Smallwood, F. Liu, Y. Ju and Ö.L. Gülder, Proc. Combust. Inst., 30 303-311 (2005).

Google Scholar

[5] A.E. Lutz, R.J. Kee, J.F. Grcar and F.M. Rupley, OPPDIF: A Fortran Program for Computing Opposed-flow Diffusion Flames, Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND96-8243, (1997).

DOI: 10.2172/568983

Google Scholar

[6] R.J. Kee, F. Rupley, J. Miller, M. Coltrin, J. Grcar, E. Meeks, H. Moffat, A. Lutz, G. Dixon-Lewis, M. Smooke, J. Warnatz, G. Evans, R. Larson, R. Mitchell, L. Petzold, L. Reynolds, M. Caracotsios, W. Stewart, P. Glarborg, C. Wang and O. Adigun, CHEMKIN Collection, Release 3. 6, Reaction Design, Inc., San Diego, CA, (2000).

Google Scholar

[7] S. Hu, P. Wang and R.W. Pitz, Proc. Combust. Inst., 32 1133-1140 (2009).

Google Scholar

[8] Q. Li, P. Wang, F. Xing and J. Zou, J. Eng. Thermophysics, 32 1949-1952 (2011).

Google Scholar

[9] P. Wang, J.A. Wehrmeyer and R.W. Pitz, Combust. Flame, 145 401-414 (2006).

Google Scholar

[10] F.A. Williams. Sandiego20051201-CK. txt, NOXsandiego20041209. mec http: /mac. ucsd. edu /combustion/cermech.

Google Scholar

[11] H. Kobayashi and M. Kitano, Combust. Sci. Technol., 75 227-239 (1991).

Google Scholar

[12] J. Zheng, Z. Zhang, Z. Huang, E. Hu, C. Tang and J. Wang, Chinese Sci. Bulletin, 55 882-889 (2010).

Google Scholar

[13] S.R. Turns, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 21 361-385 (1995).

Google Scholar

[14] A. Hayhurst and E. Hutchinson, Combust. Flame, 114 274-279 (1998).

Google Scholar

[15] S. Naha and S.K. Aggarwal, Combust. Flame, 139 90-105 (2004).

Google Scholar