A Robust Design of SD-PID and BP-PID Simulated Control Model for Brake Designing

Abstract:

Based on the complexity of brake, this paper simulated the exact relationship between time and motor drive current. According to the principle of robust design, analysis of experimental data obtained the current-driven expression, and on this basis we established PID control model based on system dynamics and BP neural network self-tuning, then, this paper improved compensation for the PID control model, got the computer control method which design the current value this time based on observations of the previous period, simulated the exact relationship between the time and the motor drive current. The energy error from observation of the control simulation is very small, which verifies the correctness of the control method.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 29-32)
• Pages: 2089-2095
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.29-32.2089
• Online since: August 2010
• Authors: Dan Ma, Ji Da Huang
• Keywords: BP Neural Network (BPNN), Compensation, PID Control, System Dynamics (SD)

References

[1] G. Taguchi: Introduction to Quality Engineering. Tokyo: Asian Productivity Organization, (1986).

[2] W. Michael and J. N. Siddal: The optimisation problem with optimal tolerance assignment and full acceptance. Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 103 (1981), pp.842-898.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3254996

[3] G. Emch, and A. Parkinson: Robust optimal design for worst-case tolerances. Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 116 (1994), pp.1019-1025.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2919482

[4] A. D. Belegundu and S. H. Zhang: Robustness of design through minimum sensitivity. Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 114(2) (1992), pp.213-217.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2916933

[5] T. Iwasaki and R. E. Skelton: All controllers for the general control problem: LMI existence conditions and state space formulas. Automatics, Vol. 30 (1994), pp.1307-1317.

DOI: 10.1016/0005-1098(94)90110-4

[6] Z. Gao and P. J. Antsaklis: Explicit asymmetric bounds for robust stability of continuous and discrete-time systems. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., Vol. AC-38 (1993), pp.332-335.

DOI: 10.1109/9.250486

[7] A. Parkinson, C. Sorensen and N. Pourhassan: A general approach for robust optimal design. Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 115(1) (1993), pp.74-80.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2919328

[8] I. Elishakoff: Discussion on: A non-probabilistic concept of reliability. Structural Safety, Vol. 17 (1995), pp.195-199.

DOI: 10.1016/0167-4730(95)00010-2

[9] Y. Ben-Haim and I. Elishakoff: Convex models of uncertainty in applied mechanics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, (1990).

[10] I. Elishakoff, R. T. Haftka and J. Fang: Structural design under bounded uncertainty optimization with anti-optimization. Computers & Structures, Vol. 53 (6) (1994), pp.1401-1405.

DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(94)90405-7

[11] F. T. K. Au, Y. S. Cheng, and L. G. Tham: Robust design of structures using convex models. Computers & Structures, Vol. 81 (2003), pp.2611-2619.

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7949(03)00322-5

[12] D. B. Parkinson: The application of a robust design method to telerancing. Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 122(2) (2000), pp.149-154.

[13] D. H. Jung and B. C. Lee: Development of a simple and efficient method for robust optimization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 53 (9) (2002), pp.2201-2215.

DOI: 10.1002/nme.383