Dynamic Optimization of Hydrostatic Supported Worktable System with Circular Oil Recess

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, optimal parameters in hydrostatic supported worktable system with circular oil recess are calculated. The optimal model is established in which the objective is to make natural frequency deviate from speeds of the rotary work axis, and the design variables are recess number, initial oil film thickness and recess radius. As the design variable vector includes both discrete and continuous components, two-phase optimization strategy is developed. Furthermore Fibonacci method is applied to deal with the problem of discrete variable, and response surface methodology is used to form an explicit expression between the objective expression and continuous variables. Then the optimal model is solved by gradient projection method and simplex method. As a result, numerical calculation of dynamic optimization with hydrostatic worktable system with circular recess shows that two-strategy optimization algorithm is stable and effectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

8-11

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Chen D, et al. Dynamic and static characteristics of a hydrostatic spindle for machine tools[J]. journal of manufacturing system. 2010, 11: 1-6.

Google Scholar

[2] T.A. Osman, M. Dorid, Z.S. Safar et. al. Experimental assessment of hydrostatic thrust bearing performance[J]. tribology international 1996, 29(3): 233-240.

DOI: 10.1016/0301-679x(95)00078-i

Google Scholar

[3] Satish C. Sharma, Vikas M. Phalle, S.C. Jain. Performance analysis of a multirecess capillary compensated conical hydrostatic journal bearing[J]. Tribology International, 2011, 44: 617-626.

DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2010.12.012

Google Scholar

[4] E. Solmaz, F.C. Babalik et. al. Multicriteria optimization for hydrostatic bearing design[J]. Industrial lubrication and tribology 2002, 54, 1: 20-26.

DOI: 10.1108/00368790210415338

Google Scholar

[5] W. H. Tong G R L. An optimizaiton procedure for truss structures with discrete design variables and dynamic constraints[J]. Computers & Structures. 2001, 79: 155-162.

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7949(00)00124-3

Google Scholar

[6] Zheng Xiaolong, Ye hongling, Sui Yongkang et. al. The Fitting of Response Surface Function with Maximum Difference Minimization Method[J]. 2010, 28(17): 36-41.

Google Scholar