Interlaminar Shear Strength and Fractographic Evaluation with Varying Temperature and Moisture Content of Thermoplastic Composites

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper is related to the understanding of the relationship between the apparent interlaminar shear strength and the temperature-moisture content by the analysis of the dominant failure mode. It assesses the fracture mode of laminates with carbon fiber fabrics in (0, 90, 45)S ply orientation reinforced Polyphenylenesulphide (PPS) polymer matrix, tested for Interlaminar Shear Strength by the Short Beam method. Tests were conduced at different temperatures: (+20°C), (+0°C), and (-55°C), under various moisture-absorbed contents, namely Dry, 25%, 50%, and 75% of the saturated condition. Fractographic analyses were made and reveal, by the analysis of the fracture surface, the dominant mode of failure in every temperature-moisture content pair. As expected it is verified that temperature is a degradation factor. It is also found that humidity is not a degradation factor and, above the water freezing temperature, the moisture content even becomes a strengthening factor on this thermoplastic composite

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

179-184

Citation:

Online since:

August 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2005 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M.N. Bureau, J. Denault: Composites Science and Technology, 64 (2004), pp.1785-1794.

Google Scholar

[2] K-Y. Kim, L. Ye: Composites Part A, 35 (2004), pp.477-487.

Google Scholar

[3] J.C. Williams, E.A. Starke Jr: Acta Materialia, 51 (2003), pp.5775-5799.

Google Scholar

[4] V. Bellenger,J. Decelle, N. Huet: Composites Part B, 36 (2005), pp.189-194.

Google Scholar

[5] M-H. Han, J. A, Nair: Composites Part A, 34 (2003), pp.979-986.

Google Scholar

[6] R. Selzer, K. Friedrich: Composites Part A, 28A. (1997), pp.595-604.

Google Scholar

[7] C-C.M. Ma, S.W. Yur: Polymer Engineering and Science, Vol. 31, nº1 (1991), pp.34-39.

Google Scholar

[8] R. Selzer, K. Friedrich: J. Material Science, Vol. 30, nº 2 (1995), pp.334-338.

Google Scholar

[9] N.A. St. John, J.R. Brown: Composites Part A, 29A (1998), pp.939-946.

Google Scholar

[10] J.S. Earl, R.A. Shenoi: Composites Part A, 35 (2004), pp.1237-1247.

Google Scholar

[11] M. Hussain, A. Nakahira, S. Nishijima, K. Niihara: Composites Part A, 31 (2000), pp.173-179.

Google Scholar

[12] C. Nightingale, R.J. Day: Composites Part A, 33 (2002), pp.1021-1030.

Google Scholar

[13] MIL HDBK 17 - 1E; Vol. 1; Jan (1997).

Google Scholar

[14] M. Hojo, K. Tanaka: Fractography of the Delamination Fatigue Crack Growth in CFRP Laminates, in Advances in Fiber Composite Materials, Chapter 7, (The Society of Materials Science, Japan 1994), pp.123-155.

Google Scholar

[15] L.A.L. Franco, MSc Thesis: Fractographic Analysis of Advanced Polymeric Composites, ITA (São José dos Campos-Brazil, 2003).

Google Scholar

[16] D. Purslow: Composites, V. 19, nº 2 (1988), pp.115-126.

Google Scholar