Single-Row Facility Layout Based on Manufacturing Costs

Article Preview

Abstract:

Single-row facility layout is widely used in manufacturing system. It has a very important effect on the performance of manufacturing system. The single-row facility layout, including linear, U-shape, and semi-circular layout are introduced firstly. Based on the lower selling price of customers’ demand, the components of manufacturing cost are analyzed secondly. Then the relationship between the manufacturing cost and objectives of single-row layout are described. Meanwhile, the mathematical and simulation models related to several parts of manufacturing cost of single-row layout are set up respectively. Finally, the simulation of these models for single-row layout is running in QUEST. After analyzing the simulation results, conclusions are obtained: (1) material handling cost of semi-circular layout is the lowest among the three types of single-row facility layout; (2) area utilization rate of U-shape layout is higher than others; (3) equipment and labor utilization of U-shape layout is the higher than others in the same moment. This research results will

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

140-145

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R.D. Meller, K.Y. Gau, The facility layout problem: recent and emerging trends and perspectives, J. Manuf. Systems, Vol. 15(1996)No. 5, p.351.

DOI: 10.1016/0278-6125(96)84198-7

Google Scholar

[2] R.L. Francis, J.A. White, Facility layout and location, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, (1974).

Google Scholar

[3] M.M.D. HASSAN, Machine layout problem in modern manufacturing facilities, INT.J. PROD. RES., Vol. 32(1994)No. 11, p.2559.

Google Scholar

[4] W. Skinner, The focused factory, Harvard Business Review, May-June 1974, p.38.

Google Scholar

[5] M.P. Groover, Fundamentals of Modem Manufacturing: Materials, Processes, and Systems, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., (1996).

Google Scholar

[6] M.J. Wang, A solution to the unequal area facilities layout problem by genetic algorithm, Computers in Industry, Vol. 56(2005), p.207.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2004.06.003

Google Scholar

[7] T. Østbye, D.F. Lobach, D. Cheesborough, A.M.M. Lee, K.M. Krause, V. Hasselblad, and D. Bright, Evaluation of an infrared/radiofrequency equipment-tracking system in a tertiary care hospital, , Journal of Medical Systems, Vol. 27(2003).

Google Scholar

[8] M. Vineyard, A.G. Kwasi, J.R. Meredith, An evaluation of maintenance policies for flexible manufacturing systems: A case study, Int. J. Oper. & Prod. Mgmt., Vol. 20(2000)No. 4, p.409.

Google Scholar

[9] P. Steege, Overall equipment effectiveness in resist processing equipment, Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference. IEEEISEMI, (1996).

DOI: 10.1109/asmc.1996.557975

Google Scholar

[10] H. Entorf, H. König, W. Pohlmeier, Labor utilization and nonwage labor costs in a disequilibrium macro framework, Scand. J. of Economics, Vol. 94(1992)No. 1, p.71.

DOI: 10.2307/3440469

Google Scholar