Applications of Multiple Objective Genetic Algorithms in the Optimization Design of Tracked Self-Moving Power’s Layout

Article Preview

Abstract:

A multi-objective genetic algorithm is applied into the layout optimization of tracked self-moving power. The layout optimization mathematical model was set up. Then introduced the basic principles of NSGA-Ⅱ, which is a Pareto multi-objective optimization algorithm. Finally, NSGA-Ⅱwas presented to solve the layout problem. The algorithm was proved to be effective by some practical examples. The results showed that the algorithm can spread toward the whole Pareto front, and provide many reasonable solutions once for all.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

161-165

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Lodi, S. Martello and M. Monaci. Two-dimensional Packing Problem: a Survey. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 141, no. 2, pp.241-252, (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00123-6

Google Scholar

[2] D. Kalyanmony, P. Amrit and A. Sameer. A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-Ⅱ. IEEE Transaction on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp.182-197, (2002).

DOI: 10.1109/4235.996017

Google Scholar

[3] S. Kentaro, K. Shinsuke and H. Kyosuke. Structural analysis of Pareto-optimal solution sets for multi-objective optimization: an application to outer window design problems using Multiple Objective Genetic Algorithms. Building and Environment, vol. 45, no. 5, pp.1144-1152, (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.10.021

Google Scholar

[4] Ru An Yun, Zeng Chuan Dong and Hao Fang Wang. Multiobjective optimization of a reservoir based on NSGA-Ⅱ. Journal of Shangdong University (Engineering Science), vol. 40, no. 6, pp.124-128, (2010).

Google Scholar

[5] S. Pradyumn Kumar and D. Kalyanmoy. On finding multiple Pareto-optimal solutions using classical and evolutionary generating methods. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 181, no. 3, pp.1630-1652, (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.08.002

Google Scholar

[6] Bao Zhang, Hong Fei Teng and Yan Jun Shi. Layout optimization of satellite module using computing techniques. Applied Soft Computing, vol. 8, no. 1, pp.507-521, (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2007.03.004

Google Scholar

[7] Sun Xin Wang. Job-shop facility layout optimization by using genetic algorithm. Industrial Engineering, vol. 12, no. 3, pp.89-82, (2009).

Google Scholar

[8] Xuan Wang and Chang Gui Duan. Modified-genetic algorithm in optimal layout of gas network, Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp.46-48, (2006).

Google Scholar

[9] Quan Sheng Gong and Shi Qi Li. Layout design of manufacturing system based on genetic algorithms, Computer Engineering and Applications, vol. 40, no. 26, pp.202-205, (2004).

Google Scholar

[10] Quan Yuan Xu and Ying Lu. Pareto optimal solution based on multi-objective optimization genetic algorithms, Computer CD Software and Applications, no. 15, 2011, p.135.

Google Scholar

[11] Jie Li. An algorithm for rectangular packing problem. Science mosaic, no. 1, 2008, pp.22-24.

Google Scholar

[12] S. Victor, A. Matiasl and A. Carlos. Optimization to Manage Supply Chain Disruption Using the NSGA-Ⅱ. Theoretical Advances and Applications of Fuzzy Logic and Soft Computing, 2007, pp.476-485.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-72434-6_47

Google Scholar