Determination of Important Parameters and Technical Characteristic for Welding Fumes Index Development by Using QFD Approach

Abstract:

This paper discussed on the determination of important parameters and technical characteristic for the development of a welding fumes index by using Quality Function Deployment (QFD) approach. Welding fumes index is developed with the objective to enhance the welding workplace safety and health. Index simplifies complex health-hazard issues of welding fumes to be comprehended easily by the employees. Questionnaires on welder desire to know the various welding fumes health effects that exist in their workplace were distributed among welders of a selected automotive assembly lines in the state Pahang, Malaysia, during a pilot case study. Results of the questionnaires show that all the customer requirements (irritants effect, sensitizer effects, respiratory system effect, systemic toxin effect, reproductive toxins effect, carcinogen effect, mixture effect) were equally important to the welders. The relationship between the customer (welder) requirement and technical characteristic were established whereby important technical characteristics were shortlisted. Development of welding fumes index according to employees demand will increase the knowledge and awareness on occupational safety and health among employees. The paper provides the main idea on development of welding fumes index taking into consideration the needs of the customer i.e. welder.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 315)
• Pages: 744-748
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.315.744
• Online since: April 2013
• Authors: Azian Hariri, Abdul Mutalib Leman, Mohammad Zainal M. Yusof
• Keywords: Quality Function Deployment (QFD), Welding Fumes, Welding Health Effect, Welding Index

References

[1] M. Hassim, M. Hurme, Inherent occupational health assessment during process research and development stage, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 23(1) (2010) 127 – 138.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2009.06.009

[2] Factories and Machinery Act (Act 139), MDC Publishers, Kuala Lumpur, 2010.

[3] Occupational Safety and Health Act (Act 514), MDC Publishers, Kuala Lumpur, 2010.

[4] M. Fera, R. Macchiaroli, Appraisal of a new risk assessment model for SME. Safety Science. 48(10) (2010) 1361 – 1368.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.05.009

[5] W. Kirch, Encyclopedia of Public Health. Springer, London, 2008.

[6] Malaysian Department of Statistic , Annual Survey of Manufacturing Industries, 2010.

[7] Malaysia ,Occupational Safety and Health (Use and Standards of Exposure to Chemical Hazardous to Health) (USECHH) Regulation (P.U. (A) 131) (2000).

[8] A. Badri, S. Nadeau, A. Gbodossou, Proposal of a risk-factor-based analytical approach for integrating occupational health and safety into project risk evaluation, Accident Analysis and Prevention. (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.05.009

[9] J.J Smallwood. The influence of engineering designers on health and safety during construction, Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering. 46(1) (2004) 2 – 8.

[10] T. Karkoszka, M. Sokovic, Integrated risk estimation of Metal Inert Gas (MIG) and Metal Active Gas (MAG) welding processes, Metalurgija. 51 (2012) 179–182.

[11] S.H. Yeo, K.G Neo, Inclusion of environmental performance for decision making of welding processes, Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 82(1-3) (1998) 78–88.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(98)00022-3

[12] R. Sadiq, S.A. Haji, G.v. Cool, and M.J. Rodriguez, Using penalty functions to evaluate aggregation models for environmental indices, Journal of Environmental Management. 91 (2010) 706-716.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.034

[13] S.C. Sofuoglu, D.J. Moschandreas, The link between symptoms of office building occupants and in-office air pollution: the indoor air pollution index, Indoor Air. 13(4) (2003) 332–344.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2003.00192.x

[14] Azian Hariri, M.Z.M. Yusof, A.M. Leman, Sub-index derivation of Welding Health-Hazard Index (WHI) for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Malaysia: accepted for publishing Applied Mechanics and Materials Journal (2012).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.229-231.2546

[15] W.R. Ott, (Ed.), Environmental Indices Theory and Practise, Ann Arbor Science Publisher Inc., Michigan, 1978.

[16] Y. Akao, Quality Function Deployment -Integrating Customer Requirements Into Product Design. Productivity Press, New York, 1990.

[17] A. Francisque, M.J. Rodriguez, R. Sadiq, L.F. Miranda, F. Proulx, Reconciling actual risk with perceived risk for distributed water quality: A QFD-based approach, Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology. (2011) 321–342.

DOI: 10.2166/aqua.2011.108

[18] A. Leman, A. Omar, W. Jung, M. Yusof, The development of an industrial air pollution monitoring system for safety and health enhancement and sustainable work environment using QFD approach, The Asian Journal on Quality. 11(2010) 165–182.

DOI: 10.1108/15982681011075970

[19] NIOSH (U.S), NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, 2007.

[20] M. Mumtaz, Principle and Practice of Mixture Toxicology, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2010.