Microwave Induced Co-Processing of Biomass/Coal Blends

Abstract:

Co-processing of biomass with coal has become a promising approach for the efficient utilization of biomass and a feasible option to reduce coal consumption. Normally, biomass and coal blends are normally processed using conventional heating methods, such as co-pyrolysis, co-firing and co-gasification. Due to the fact that microwave heating has many advantages against conventional heating methods in terms of its volumetric heating and instant heating nature, in this study, biomass and coal blends were co-processed under microwave heating to enhance possible synergistic effect to improve the yield and quality of products. Biomass and coal blends were prepared in different mass fraction. Both conventional pyrolysis and microwave induced co-processing tests were carried out. The solid, liquid and gas products were analysed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and gas chromatography – mass spectrum (GC-MS). Results showed that in conventional pyrolysis, mole fraction of CO2 is relatively high whilst that of H2 is relatively low. However, for microwave induced co-processing of biomass coal blends with a mass fraction of biomass around 10wt%, the mole fraction of H2, CO and CH4 could be as high as 85%. This indicates the existence of synergy when biomass is co-processed with coal. In the liquid product, it was also found that the distribution of liquid products under microwave induced pyrolysis is much narrow compared with that of liquid products produced under conventional pyrolysis.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 319)
• Pages: 227-232
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.319.227
• Online since: May 2013
• Authors: Kai Qi Shi, Tao Wu, Hai Tao Zhao, Edward Lester, Yao Dong Wang
• Keywords: Biomass Blends, Coal Blend, Conventional Pyrolysis, Co-Pyrolysis, Microwave Induced Pyrolysis

References

[1] Hein KRG, Bemtgen JM. EU clean coal technology—co-combustion of coal and biomass. Fuel Process Technol (1998); 54:159-169.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3820(97)00067-2

[2] Harding NS, Adams BR. Biomass as a reburning fuel: a specialized cofiring application. Biomass and Bioenergy (2000); 19:429-445.

DOI: 10.1016/s0961-9534(00)00054-4

[3] Hughes EE, Tillman DA. Biomass cofiring: status and prospects 1996. Fuel Processing Technology (1998); 54:127-142.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3820(97)00064-7

[4] Demirbaş A. Sustainable cofiring of biomass with coal. Energy Conversion and Management (2003); 44:1465-1479.

DOI: 10.1016/s0196-8904(02)00144-9

[5] Sami M, Annamalai K, Wooldridge M. Co-firing of coal and biomass fuel blends. Prog Energ Combust (2001); 27:171-214.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-1285(00)00020-4

[6] Sahu SG, Sarkar P, Chakraborty N, Adak AK. Thermogravimetric assessment of combustion characteristics of blends of a coal with different biomass chars. Fuel Process Technol (2010); 91:369-378.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.12.001

[7] Skoulou VK, Manara P, Zabaniotou AA. H2 enriched fuels from co-pyrolysis of crude glycerol with biomass. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis (2012); 97:198-204.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2012.05.011

[8] Haykiri-Acma H, Yaman S. Interaction between biomass and different rank coals during co-pyrolysis. Renewable Energy (2010); 35:288-292.

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2009.08.001

[9] Vuthaluru HB. Thermal behaviour of coal/biomass blends during co-pyrolysis. Fuel Processing Technology (2004); 85:141-155.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3820(03)00112-7

[10] Sebastián F, Royo J, Gómez M. Cofiring versus biomass-fired power plants: GHG (Greenhouse Gases) emissions savings comparison by means of LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) methodology. Energy (2011); 36:2029-2037.

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.06.003

[11] Emami Taba L, Irfan MF, Wan Daud WAM, Chakrabarti MH. The effect of temperature on various parameters in coal, biomass and CO-gasification: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (2012); 16:5584-5596.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.06.015

[12] Kumabe K, Hanaoka T, Fujimoto S, Minowa T, Sakanishi K. Co-gasification of woody biomass and coal with air and steam. Fuel (2007); 86:684-689.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2006.08.026

[13] De S, Assadi M. Impact of cofiring biomass with coal in power plants – A techno-economic assessment. Biomass and Bioenergy (2009); 33:283-293.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.07.005

[14] Sondreal EA, Benson SA, Hurley JP, Mann MD, Pavlish JH, Swanson ML, Weber GF, Zygarlicke CJ. Review of advances in combustion technology and biomass cofiring. Fuel Processing Technology (2001); 71:7-38.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3820(01)00134-5

[15] Tillman DA, Duong DNB, Harding NS. Chapter 4 - Blending Coal with Biomass: Cofiring Biomass with Coal. In: Solid Fuel Blending. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2012, pp.125-200.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-380932-2.00004-0

[16] Saidur R, Abdelaziz EA, Demirbas A, Hossain MS, Mekhilef S. A review on biomass as a fuel for boilers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (2011); 15:2262-2289.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.015

[17] Fernández Llorente MJ, Carrasco García JE. Comparing methods for predicting the sintering of biomass ash in combustion. Fuel (2005); 84:1893-1900.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2005.04.010

[18] Pang CH, Hewakandamby B, Wu T, Lester E. An automated ash fusion test for characterisation of the behaviour of ashes from biomass and coal at elevated temperatures. Fuel.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.06.120