The Research of Tissue Engineering Scaffold about Spinal Cord Injury

Article Preview

Abstract:

The rapid development of tissue engineering brings new hope to the neurological function recovery after spinal cord injury. The three-dimensional structure of scaffold is a key factor to treat spinal cord injury in tissue engineering method. In this paper, low-temperature deposition manufacturing (LDM) is discussed and basic process about scaffold forming is brief related. The principle of low-temperature deposition manufacturing and some important process parameters were studied. Some experience values are obtained from experiment. The biological environment in vivo was proposed as an important basis for the design of spinal cord scaffold. Then the spinal cord scaffold is separated into gray matter and white matter induced function area by the separate layer of low porosity and small pore size. The experiment results show that the big pores of scaffold are round and regular. The scaffold includes a large number of irregular pore structure, and good penetrating. The scaffold porosity of 86.38% could well meet the needs of the high porosity.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

383-389

Citation:

Online since:

October 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Langer R, Vacanti JP: Science Vol. 260(1993), pp.920-926.

Google Scholar

[2] Michael J. Moore, Jonathan A. Friedman, Eric B. Lewellyn and Sara M. Mantila: BiomaterialsVol. 27(2006), pp.419-429.

Google Scholar

[3] R.E. Potter Kalil, W.J. Kao: Front Biosci Vol. 13 (2008), pp.806-821.

Google Scholar

[4] Ma W, Fitzgerald W and Liu QY: Exp Neurol Vol. 190(2004)No. 2, pp.276-288.

Google Scholar

[5] Yoshii S, Ito S, Shima M, et a1: Tissue Eng Regen Med Vol. 3 (2009)No. 1, pp.19-25.

Google Scholar

[6] Wu S, Suzuki Y, Kitada M, et a1: Neurosci Lett Vol. 312 (2001)No. 3, pp.173-176.

Google Scholar

[7] Y.H. Cheng, J. Liang and X.D. Wang: Chinese Journal of Experimental Surgery Vol. 21(2004) No. 1, pp.26-27.

Google Scholar

[8] Y.C. Huang, Y.Y. Huang, C.C. Huang, et a1: Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Vol. 74(2005) No. 1, pp.659-664.

Google Scholar

[9] Hiroyuki Itosaka, Satoshi Kuroda, Hideo Shichinohe, Hiroshi Yasuda, et al: Neuropathology Vol. 29 (2009), pp.248-257.

Google Scholar

[10] Iwakawa M, Mizoik K, Tessier A, et al: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Vol. 15 (2001) No. 3, pp.173-182.

Google Scholar

[11] B.Y. Wang: Journal of Medical Postgraduates Vol. 21 (2008) No. 5, pp.547-552.

Google Scholar

[12] C.M. Patist, M.B. Mulder, S.E. Gautier, et a1: Biomaterials Vol. 25 (2004)No. 9, pp.1569-1582.

Google Scholar

[13] M.P. Vacanti, J.L. Leonard, B. Dore, et a1: Transplant Proc, Vol. 33 ( 2001) No. (1-2), pp.592-598.

Google Scholar

[14] Y.D. Teng, E.B. Lavik, X. Qu, et al: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA Vol. 99 (2002) No. 5, pp.3024-3029.

Google Scholar

[15] H.E. Olson, G.E. Rooney, L. Gross, et a1: Tissue Eng Vol. 15 (2009) No. 7, p. l797-1805.

Google Scholar

[16] Q.S. Xie, L.X. Li, B.S. Wang, et al: Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research Vol. 11(2007) No. 10, pp.1850-1853.

Google Scholar

[17] Aaron J. Krych, Gemma E. Rooney, Bingkun Chen, et al: Acta Biomaterialia Vol. 5 (2009), pp.2551-2559.

Google Scholar