Principles of Interaction Design Research Based on Cognitive Characteristics

Article Preview

Abstract:

Interactive products need to have human qualities. Designers need to give the characteristics to the product. Analysis of the cognitive process and cognition import the interaction design, we can sum up nine principles of interaction design for four aspect: concerns unity, visibility, visual structural optimization, memory capacity limited, simple and complex conservation, affordance, feedback mechanisms, the targeted emotional experience, fault tolerance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3446-3449

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Jesse James Garret. The elements of user experience: user-centered design for the web and beyond[M]. Berkeley: New Riders Press, (2011).

Google Scholar

[2] Robert Mills Gagne, Psychological Principles in System Development[M]. Ann Arbor: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, (1962).

Google Scholar

[3] Victor Kaptelinin, Bonnie A. Nardi. Acting with Technology, Activity Theory and Interaction Design[J]. Visible Language, 2008, 42(2): 196.

Google Scholar

[4] Jennifer Preece, Yvonne Rogers, Helen Sharp. Interaction design, beyond human-computer interaction[M]. New Jersey: Wiley, (2003).

DOI: 10.1145/967199.967218

Google Scholar

[5] Rudolf Arnheim. Art and visual perception: a psychology of the creative eye[M]. California: University of California Press, (2004).

Google Scholar

[6] Donald A. Norman,Living with Complexity[M]. Boston: The MIT Press, (2010).

Google Scholar

[7] Donald A. Norman, The Design of Everyday Things[M]. New York: Basic Books, (2002).

Google Scholar

[8] Steve Heim. The resonant interface HCI foundations for interaction design[M]. Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc, (2008).

Google Scholar

[9] Ioannis Xenakis, Argyris Arnellos. The relation between interaction aesthetics and affordances[J]. Design Studies, 2013, 34: 57-73.

DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2012.05.004

Google Scholar