Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) in Construction Risk Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

Construction project scheduling is one of the most critical factors for project success measurement. Critical Path Method (CPM) is commonly used in the construction industry for project scheduling. CPM is a deterministic method that ignores uncertainties in activities through the network, which determines the duration of the projects. Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) is a probabilistic method based on the assumption that the duration of a single activity can be described by a probability density function. PERT takes into account the uncertainties during the construction process to plan, schedule and control complex projects with many uncertainties. The work reported in this paper describes the PERT work process to carry out the construction schedule risk assessment and illustrates the model through case studies. The utilization in the estimate the construction liquidated damage with the uncertainties is performed, which also can be used in the insurance company to calculate the insurance premium.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2334-2337

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. M. Wickwire and T.J. Driscoll, et al: Construction Scheduling: Preparation, Liability, and Claims, 2d ed., Aspen Publishers, (2003).

Google Scholar

[2] Information on: http: /www. born2process. com/Management/Project%20Control. pdf.

Google Scholar

[3] F. H. Griffis and J.V. Farr, in: Construction Planning for Engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York, (2000).

Google Scholar

[4] S. Mubarak: Construction Project Scheduling and Control, Pearson/ Prentice Hall, New Jersey, (2005).

Google Scholar

[5] Information on : http: /www. interventions. org/pertcpm. html.

Google Scholar

[6] A.D. Smith, submitted to Project Management Journal, (2003).

Google Scholar