Lane Change Decision Analysis Based on Drivers' Perception-Judgment and Game Theory

Article Preview

Abstract:

To clearly understand the mechanism of drivers lane-changing decision, based on drivers perception of external information, integrated cognitive judgment and game theory, the decision-making model was established, then the structure and operating mechanism of the model were detailedly analyzed. By introducing game theory-related knowledge, the non-cooperative mixed strategy game between the object vehicle and the following vehicle in the target lane was further discussed. Then, the benefits and Nash equilibrium solution of the participants in the game were deeply researched. Analysis shows that lane-changing decision is composed of information perception and three judgment-decision processes, the factors which would affect decision-making level include information source characteristics, the ability of drivers perception and comprehensive cognitive judgment, driving behavior characteristics and so on. The Nash equilibrium solution of the lane change game is determined by driving safety level, journey time and importance degree of the revenues.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1875-1879

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Traffic Administration Bureau of Chinese Public Security Ministry. Statistics annals of road traffic of PRC (in Chinese). Beijing: Traffic Administration Bureau of Chinese Public Security Ministry, (2011).

Google Scholar

[2] Yuhai Wang, Jian Song, Xingkun Li. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development (in Chinese), 2005, 22(12): 113-118.

Google Scholar

[3] Liu A. In: G. Under wood (Ed). Eye guidance in reading and scene perception, England: Elsevier, 1998: 431 – 452.

Google Scholar

[4] N. Kuge, T. Yamamura, O. Shimoyama, A. Liu. SAE Technical Paper, 2000-01-0349, (2000).

Google Scholar

[5] Matthias J. Henning, Olivier georgeon. Transportation Research Part F 4 (2001): 1-7.

Google Scholar

[6] Dario D. Salvucci, Andrew Liu. Transportation Research Part F 5 (2002): 123-132.

Google Scholar

[7] WANG Yuhai, SONG Jian, LI Xingkun. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2005, 22(12): 113-118.

Google Scholar

[8] Rafael Toledo-Moreo. Transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 2009, 10(1): 23-29.

Google Scholar

[9] T. Toledo, H. N. Koutsopoulos, and M. E. Ben-Akiva. Transportation Research Record, 2003: 30-38.

Google Scholar

[10] Aris Polychronopoulos, Christos Koutsimanis, Manolis Tsogas. 7th International Conference on Information Fusion (2005): 1396-1403.

Google Scholar