Studies on Classification Performance Assessment of a Dry Classifier Based on Analytical Hierarchy Process

Abstract:

The classification performance of a dry classifier depends on cut size, classification accuracy, classification efficiency, classifier process capability, and yield of fine powders, which should meet the required particle-size distribution. Consequently, the classification performance indices limit each other and only a comprehensive assessment of these classification performance indices can evaluate the classification performance truly and synthetically. In the present paper, the Analytic Hierarchy Process is used to calculate the weights of the classification performance indices after determining the hierarchical model. The dimensionless transformation eliminates the effect of the different dimensions. Then, the comprehensive assessed value of the classification performance for each experiment is obtained using the linear weighted method. The maximum value corresponds to the best classification performance among these assessed values. In the present study, a turbo air classifier was used as the classification system and talc powders were used as materials. The best classification performance indices were a cut size of 21 μm, a classification precision index of 0.6, a Newton classification efficiency of 61%, and a yield of fine powders of 57%. The corresponding optimal operational parameter combination consists of a feeding speed of 1.1 kg/min, a wind speed of 8 m/s, and the rotary speed of its rotor cage is 1200 rpm. This assessment method avoids the limitation of evaluating a single classification performance index and the incomplete information derived from single factor experiments. Furthermore, the method also provides quantitative evaluation criteria for the classification performance of a dry classifier. In the proposed method, the classification performance indices can be selected and the comparison matrix can be set flexibly according to production requirements.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 364)
• Pages: 828-832
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.364.828
• Online since: August 2013
• Authors: Yuan Yu, Jia Xiang Liu
• Keywords: Analysis Hierarchy Process (AHP), Classification Performance, Dry Classification, Turbo Air Classifier

References

[1] M Shapiro V G. Air Classification of Solid Particles: a Review[J]. Chemical Engineering and Processing. 2005(44): 279-285.

[2] GAO Likun, CHEN Yun. A study on the rare earth ore containing scandium by high gradient magnetic separation [J]. Journal of Rare Earths. 2010, 28 (04): 622-626.

DOI: 10.1016/s1002-0721(09)60167-8

[3] A H de Boer, P Hagedoorn, D Gjaltema, et al. Air classifier technology in dry powder inhalation [J]. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2006, 310(1-2): 72-80.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.11.030

[4] Yongguo Feng. Jiaxiang Liu, Shengzhao Liu. Effects of operating parameters on flow field in a turbo air classifier[J]. Minerals Engineering. 2008, 21: 598-604.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2007.11.008

[5] Qiang Huang, Yuan Yu, Jiaxiang Liu. Improvement on rotor cage structure of turbo air classifier and numerical simulation of inner flow field[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering. 2011, 5: 1264-1268.

[6] Qiyuan Jiang. Mathematic Model[M]. Beijing: China Higher Education Press. 2000. 10.

[7] Guohua Wang, Dong Liang. Decision Theory and Methodology[M]. Hefei: Press of University of Science and Technology of China. 2006. 3.

[8] Yuda Hu. Practical Multi-object Optimization[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Science & Technology Press. 1990. 4.