Product Evolution Design Oriented Quality Characteristic Positioning Based on Two-Dimensional Space

Article Preview

Abstract:

How to identify customer requirements exactly and put them through the entire product development is the key of improving customer satisfaction and increasing product competitiveness. Product development was treated in the perspective of quality characteristic evolution and an evolution process model was constructed in this paper. To guarantee the direction of QCs evolution, a QCs positioning framework consisting of 3 phases was proposed. QCs two-dimensional space was built with vertical and horizontal series which were obtained with methods of dynamic Kano model and fuzzy C-means clustering. QCs potential areas were selected with customer intention and product distribution investigations and QCs target areas were finally identified based on analysis on customer satisfaction and importance weight with quarter diagrams. A case of combustion engine was provided to illustrate the application QCs positioning framework.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1282-1288

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Griffin A, Hauser JR, The voice of customer, Proceeding of MSI working series, Boston, Mass., USA: Marketing Sciences Institute, 1992, Report: 92-106.

Google Scholar

[2] Bergman, B., Quality from customer needs to customer satisfaction, McGraw-Hill, London, (1994).

Google Scholar

[3] Karin Bergquist, John Abeysekera, Quality function deployment (QFD)―A means for developing usable products, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 1996, 18: 269-275.

DOI: 10.1016/0169-8141(95)00051-8

Google Scholar

[4] Hubka V. Design for quality, International Conference on Engineering Design, Harrogate, 1989: 1321-1333.

Google Scholar

[5] He Yihai, Tang Xiaoqing. Design for qualty based on product key quality characteristics. Acta Aeronautica et astronautica Sinica, 2007, V. 28 (6): 1468-1481.

Google Scholar

[6] Xie Youbai. Study on the modern design theory and methodology. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2004, V. 40(4): 1-8.

Google Scholar

[7] Wen BangChun. Product comprehensive design of general function and performance. China Machine Press, Beijing, (2008).

Google Scholar

[8] Hannu Kärkkäinen, Petteri Piippo, Markku Tuominena. Ten tools for customer-driven product development in industrial companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 2001, V69, Issue 2: 161-176.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-5273(00)00030-x

Google Scholar

[9] ISO 9001: 2008. Quality management systems-Requirements. ISO, (2008).

Google Scholar

[10] Wang Yang, Duan Guijiang. Comoplex product design process model based on generalized characters evolution. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2011, V17 (12): 2562-2572.

Google Scholar

[11] Fan Yang, Gui-jiang Duan. Developing a parameter linkage-based method for searching change propagation paths. Research in Engineering Design, 2012, V. 23 Issu. 4: 353-372.

DOI: 10.1007/s00163-011-0124-7

Google Scholar

[12] Nie Da-an et al. Simultaneous multi-product design method based on customer requirements classification. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2010, V16(6): 1131-1137.

Google Scholar

[13] Liao Baosong, Cao Dianli. Fuzzy mathematics and its application. Science Press, Beijing, (2007).

Google Scholar

[14] John Benjamin Heywood. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals. McGraw Hill Higher Education, (1988).

Google Scholar

[15] Yuan Zhaocheng. Internal-combustion engine design. Machine Industry Press, Beijing, (2011).

Google Scholar