Performance Comparison between PID Controller and State-Feedback Controller with Integral Action in Position Control of DC Motor

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents the design of PID controller and State-Feedback controller with integral action to control the position of DC motor.PID controller is tuned using Ziegler-Nichol’s rules. State-Feedback controller is designed by determining the state feedback gain matrix using Ackermann’s formula. The aim of this paper is to compare the time domain characteristics of system response between PID controller and State feedback Controller with integral action. The Simulation results are demonstrated using MATLAB.Graphical User Interface (GUI) is developed for both the controllers. According to the Simulation result, State-Feedback controller with integral action has the better performance in terms of peak overshoot and settling time as compared to PID controller.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

188-193

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Neenu Thomas, Dr. P. Poongodi: Position Control of DC Motor Using Genetic Algorithm Based PID Controller, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2009 Vol II WCE 2009, July 1 - 3, 2009, London, U. K.

Google Scholar

[2] Ang, K. H, Chong, G.C. Y, and Li, Y, PID Control System Analysis, Design, and Technology, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 13, Issue 4, pp.559-576, (2005).

DOI: 10.1109/tcst.2005.847331

Google Scholar

[3] Astrom, K., T. Hagglund, PID Controllers: Theory, Design and Tuning, Instrument Society of America, Research Triangle park , (2005).

Google Scholar

[4] Qing-Guo Wang, Tong-Heng Lee, PID Tuning for Improved performance, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. -7, no. 4 July 1999, PP: 457-465.

DOI: 10.1109/87.772161

Google Scholar

[5] O. Dwyer, PI And PID Controller Tuning Rules For Time Delay Process: A Summary. Part 1: PI ControllerTuning Rules , Proceedings Of Irish Signals And Systems Conference, June (1999).

DOI: 10.1016/s1474-6670(17)38237-x

Google Scholar

[6] N. Muruganantham, Dr. S. Palani, State space Modelling & Simulation of Sensor-less Permanent Magnet BLDC Motor, International Journal of Engineering Science & Technology Vol. 2 (10), 2010, 5099-5106.

Google Scholar

[7] Cominos P. and Munro N. (2002) IEEE Control Theory and Applications, 46-53.

Google Scholar

[8] Zhang J., Wang N. and Wang S. (2004) American Control Conference, 1109-1114.

Google Scholar

[9] Luca Zaccarian: DC motors: dynamic model and control techniques.

Google Scholar

[10] J.J. D' Azzo and C. H. Houpious, Linear Control System Analysis & Design, McGraw Hill, New York, (1995).

Google Scholar

[11] Ogata K. (1970) Modern Control Engineering, Prentice-Hall.

Google Scholar

[12] Khairul Anuar Bin Aris: Development of Motor Control using Graphical User Interface, University Malaysia Pahang.

Google Scholar

[13] Robert Babuska and Stefano Stramigioli: Matlab and Simulink for Modeling and Control.

Google Scholar

[14] Information on http: / library. cmu. edu.

Google Scholar