Adaptable Redesign of Existing Equipment Responding to Unanticipated Environment Changes

Article Preview

Abstract:

Complex equipment usually needs to be designed according to a working environment, for example Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM). But the environment can change in an unanticipated way, which usually leads to inferior performance for equipment and ultimately results in a great loss. Thus how to rapidly respond to unanticipated environment changes (UEC) is an important issue to be resolved for existing products. This paper discusses the adaptable redesign of existing equipment, which performs adaptation or adding new components in existing equipment, avoids redesigning or remanufacturing new equipment so as to quickly meet expected performance requirements. For a complex equipment with many interrelated parameters, there might exist couplings and even contradictions in the redesign. And it is difficult for engineers to determine how changes in certain parameters affect the system performance. The key issues of the redesign are discussed including function-structure analysis, structure change propagation prediction and contradiction resolving. The design issue is analyzed in an existing TBM responding to unanticipated ground changes.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

77-81

Citation:

Online since:

November 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] E. Fricke, B. Gebhard, H. Negele and E. Igenbergs: Syst Eng, Vol. 3 (2000) No. 4, pp.169-179.

Google Scholar

[2] G. Taguchi, E. Elsayed and T. Hsiang: Quality Engineering in Production Systems (McGraw-Hill, USA 1989).

Google Scholar

[3] P. Gu, M. Hashemian and A.Y.C. Nee: Ann CIRP, Vol. 53 (2004) No. 1, pp.1-19.

Google Scholar

[4] E. Fricke and A.P. Schulz: Syst Eng, Vol. 8 (2005) No. 4, pp.342-359.

Google Scholar

[5] C. Eckert, P.J. Clarkson and W. Zanker: Res Eng Des, Vol. 15 (2004) No. 1, pp.1-21.

Google Scholar

[6] J. Zhao, Q.M. Gong and Z. Eisensten: Tunn Undergr Space Technol, Vol. 22 (2007), pp.388-400.

Google Scholar

[7] H.F. Teng, Y.S. Wang and B. Zhang: Fron Mech Eng China , Vol. 2 (2007) No. 2, pp.184-192.

Google Scholar

[8] G. Pahl and W. Beitz: Engineering Design-systematic Approach(Sringer-Verlag, England 2000).

Google Scholar

[9] G. Altshuller: The Innovation Algorithm, TRIZ, Systematic Innovation and Technical Creativity (Technical Innovation Center, Worcester 1999).

Google Scholar

[10] P.J. Clarkson, C. Simons and C. Eckert: ASME J Mech Des, Vol. 126 (2004), pp.788-797.

Google Scholar

[11] T.R. Browning: IEEE Trans Eng Manage, Vol. 48 (2001) No. 3, pp.292-306.

Google Scholar

[12] H.F. Teng, Y.S. Wang and Y.J. Shi: J Mech Eng, Vol. 42 (2006) No. 10, pp.1-8. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[13] Z.J. Liu and H. F Teng: Proc. of the 2009 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computational Intelligence (Shanghai, China, 2009), pp.120-124.

Google Scholar