Quantifying Ordinal Performance of Ant Colony Optimization

Article Preview

Abstract:

In contrast to many successful applications of ant colony optimization, the theoretical foundation is rather weak. It greatly limits the application in practical problems. One problem, called solution quality evaluation, is how to quantify the performance of the algorithm. It is hardly solved by theoretical methods. Experimental analysis method based on the analysis of search space and characteristic of algorithm itself is proposed in this paper. As algorithm runs, it would produce a large number of feasible solutions. After preprocessing, they were clustered according to distance. Then, good enough set was partitioned by the results of clustering. Last, evaluation result of ordinal performance was got by using relative knowledge of statistics. As the method only uses feasible solution produced by optimization algorithm, it is independent to specific algorithm. Therefore, the proposed method can be adopted by other intelligent optimization algorithms. The method is demonstrated through traveling salesman problem.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

387-393

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Dorigo, V. Maniezzo, and A. Colorni: The ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents, IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics–Part B, 26(1996), p.29–41.

DOI: 10.1109/3477.484436

Google Scholar

[2] M. Dorigo, and L. M. Gambardella: Ant colony system: a cooperative learning approach to the traveling salesman problem, IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation, 1(1997), p.53–66.

DOI: 10.1109/4235.585892

Google Scholar

[3] T. Stützle, and H. H. Hoos: Max-Min ant system, Future Generation Computer Systems, 16(2000), p.889–914.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-739x(00)00043-1

Google Scholar

[4] M. Dorigo and T. Stützle: Ant Colony Optimization, 1st ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, (2004).

Google Scholar

[5] W. J. Gutjahr: A graph-based ant system and its convergence, Future Generation Computer Systems, 16(2000), p.873–888.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-739x(00)00044-3

Google Scholar

[6] T. Stützle and M. Dorigo: A short convergence proof for a class of ACO algorithms, IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation, 16(2002), p.358–365.

DOI: 10.1109/tevc.2002.802444

Google Scholar

[7] F. Neumann and C. Witt: Runtime analysis of a simple ant colony optimization algorithm, in Proceedings of. 17th international symposium on High performance distributed computing, (2006), p.618–627.

DOI: 10.1007/11940128_62

Google Scholar

[8] W. J. Gutjahr: First steps to the runtime complexity analysis of ant colony optimization, Computers & Operations Research, 35(2008), p.2711–2727.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2006.12.017

Google Scholar

[9] Y. R. Zhou: Runtime analysis of an ant colony optimization algorithm for TSP instances, IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation, 13(2009), p.1083–1092.

DOI: 10.1109/tevc.2009.2016570

Google Scholar

[10] Y. C. Ho, R. S. Sreenivas, and P. Vakili: Ordinal optimizaiton of discrete event dynamic systems, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 2(1992), pp.61-88.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01797280

Google Scholar

[11] Y. C. Ho, Q. C. Zhao, and Q. S. Jia: Ordinal Optimization: Soft Coputation for Hard Problems. Springer Verlag, (2007).

Google Scholar

[12] S. Ben-David, and A. Borodin: A new measure for the study of on-line algorithms, Algorithmica, 11(1994), pp.73-91.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01294264

Google Scholar

[13] J. Aspnes, and O. Waarts: Compositional competitiveness for distributed algorithms, Journal of Algorithms, 54(2005), pp.127-151.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgor.2004.06.004

Google Scholar

[14] J. Hüsler, P. Cruz, and A. Hall: On optimizaiton and extreme value theory, Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, 5(2003), pp.183-195.

Google Scholar

[15] D. P. Bertsekas: Nonlinear Programming, 2nd ed. Belmont, MA, USA: Athena Scientific, (1999).

Google Scholar

[16] Z. Shen, Y. C. Ho, and Q. C. Zhao: Ordinal optimization and quantification of heuristic designs, Discrete Event Dynamic Systems Theory and Applications, 19(2009), pp.317-345.

DOI: 10.1007/s10626-009-0067-6

Google Scholar

[17] Z. Shen, Q. C. Zhao, and Q. S. Jia: Quantifying heuristics in the ordinal optimization framework, Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, 20(2010), pp.441-471.

DOI: 10.1007/s10626-009-0087-2

Google Scholar