Bargaining in a Push Supply Chain System under Partial Cross Ownership

Article Preview

Abstract:

Supply chain under partial cross ownership (PCO) refers to the dyad in which each one holds part of its partners shares. In a two-echelon push supply chain under the partial cross ownership, when the operational decisions are bargained, the supply chain is coordinated, and the allocation of the chain profit is dependent on the bargain coefficients and the reserve profits, and independent of the PCO structure: letting the retailer hold part of the suppliers shares doesnt affect the chain efficiency and both players profits. Similarly, letting the supplier hold part of the retailers shares doesnt affect the chain efficiency and both players profits.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

4600-4603

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Cachon, G. P. 2003. Supply chain coordination with contracts. A. G. de Kok, S. C. Graves, eds., Handbooks in OR\&MS. Elsevier.

Google Scholar

[2] Cachon, G. P. 2004. The allocation of inventory risk in a supply chain: push, pull, and advance-purchase discount contracts. Management Sci. 50(2), 222-238.

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0190

Google Scholar

[3] Chen, J., Q. Hu. 2012. Supply Chain under Partial Cross Ownership. Working Paper.

Google Scholar

[4] Lariviere, M. 1999. Supply chain contracting and coordination with stochastic demand. S. Tayur, M. Magazine, R. Ganeshan, eds. Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management. Kluwer.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-4949-9_8

Google Scholar

[5] Lariviere, M., E. Porteus. 2001. Selling to the newsvendor: An analysis of price-only contracts. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 3(4), 293-305.

DOI: 10.1287/msom.3.4.293.9971

Google Scholar

[6] Nagarajan, M., Sosic, 2008. Game-theoretic analysis of cooperation among supply chain agents: Review and extensions. European Journal of Operational Research 187, 719-745.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.045

Google Scholar

[7] Nash, J., 1951. Noncooperative games. The Annals of Mathematics, 54, 286-295.

Google Scholar

[8] Roth, A., 1979. Axiomatic Models in Bargaining. Springer-Verlag.

Google Scholar

[9] Womack, J., J. Daniel, R. Daniel. 1991. The Machine that Changed the World. New York: Harper Perennial.

Google Scholar