Composite Wing Flutter Speed and Frequency due to Variable Control Surface Deflection in Low Speed Wind Tunnel

Article Preview

Abstract:

Flutter is a dynamic instability problem represents the interaction among structural, aerodynamic, elastic and inertial forces and occurred when the energy is continuously transformed by the surrounding fluids to a flying structure in the form of kinetic energy. The study was conducted to investigate the relationship of the control surface deflection angle to the flutter speed and the flutter frequency. A wind tunnel test was performed using a flat plate wing made of composite material. It was found that by deflecting the control surface up to 45°, the flutter speed reduced almost linearly from 35.6 m/s to 22.7 m/s. The flutter frequency greatly reduced from 48 Hz without the control surface deflected to 34 Hz with the control surface deflected at 15°. After 15° deflection up to 45°, the flutter frequency reduced almost linearly.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3-7

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Silva S., Júnior V.L. Active flutter suppression in a 2-D airfoil using linear matrix inequalities techniques, Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Science and Engineering Vol. 28, No. 1, (2003).

DOI: 10.1590/s1678-58782006000100009

Google Scholar

[2] Sard Lajidhani M.H., Ovesy H.R., Shams S.H. Aeroelastic and Analysis of a Flexible Wing, Paper AIAA 2003-14924, 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Norfolk, Virginia, April 7-10, (2003).

DOI: 10.2514/6.2003-1492

Google Scholar

[3] AeroFinSim 4. 0, http: /aerorocket. com/finsim. html, September 27th, 2011, 2: 33 p. m.

Google Scholar

[4] J. R Wright and J. E Copper, Introduction to Aircraft Aeroelasticity and Loads, John Willey and Son Ltd, (2007).

Google Scholar

[5] Ashley H., Zartarian G., Piston Theory – A New Aerodynamic Tool for the Aeroelastician, Twenty-Fourth Annual Meeting, IAS, New York, January 23-26, (1956).

DOI: 10.2514/8.3740

Google Scholar

[6] Badcock K. J, Woodgate M. A, and Richard B.E., Direct Aeroelastic Bifurcation Analysis of a Symmetric Wing based on The Euler equations, Technical Report 0315, Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Glasgow, (2003).

Google Scholar

[7] Ghiringhelli G. L., Lanz M., Mantegazza P., A Comparison of Methods Used For The Identification of Flutter From Experimental Data, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Volume 119, Issue 1, pp.39-51., (1987).

DOI: 10.1016/0022-460x(87)90188-x

Google Scholar

[8] Gordinier R.E. and Melville R.B., Transonic Flutter Simulation using an Implicit Aeroelastic Solver, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 37, No. 5, pp.872-879, (2000).

DOI: 10.2514/2.2683

Google Scholar

[9] Goura G.S. L, Time Marching Analysis of Flutter Using Computational Fluid Dynamics, PhD. Thesis, University of Glasgow, (2001).

Google Scholar

[10] Hémon P., De Langre E., Schimd P., Experimental Evidence of Transient Growth of Energy Before Airfoil Flutter, Journal of Fluids and Structures, Vol. 22, Issue 3, pp.391-400, April (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2005.11.005

Google Scholar

[11] Norizam Abdul Razak, Flutter Modeling and Simulation of Wing Section Using Bondograph Technique, Master of Science Thesis, Universiti Putra Malaysia, (2005).

Google Scholar

[12] Peter Dunn, Non-Linear Stall Flutter and Divergence Analysis of Cantilevered Graphite/Epoxy Wings, AIAA Journal, Vol. 30, No. 1, January (1992).

DOI: 10.2514/3.10895

Google Scholar

[13] Stephen R. Borneman, Aeroelastic Flutter and Divergence Analysis using a New Dynamic Finite Cracked Element for Defective Laminated Composite Wing, http: /www. aeroway. ca/CR1. htm, June 4th, 2012, 7: 03 p. m.

Google Scholar

[14] Theodorsen T., General Theory of Aerodynamic Instability and the Mechanism of Flutter, NACA Report 496, (1935).

Google Scholar

[15] Yates E. C., Modified-Strip-Analysis Method for Predicting Wing Flutter at Subsonic to Hypersonic Speeds, Journal of Aircraft Vol. 3, No. 1, (1966).

DOI: 10.2514/3.43702

Google Scholar

[16] Yurkovich R., Status of Unsteady Aerodynamics Prediction for Flutter of High Performance Aircraft, Journal of Aircraft Vol. 40, No. 5, pp.832-842, (2003).

DOI: 10.2514/2.6874

Google Scholar

[17] Mahzan, M.I., Muhamad S., Mat Ali M.S., Mansor M. S, Wind Tunnel Testing of Composite Wing Flutter SpeedDue to Control Surface Excitation, Applied Mechanics and Materials Journal, vol 315, pp.359-363, (2013).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.390.3

Google Scholar

[18] Mahzan, M.I., Muhamad S., Suhot, M.A., Mat Ali M.S., Composite Structure for Micro UAV, Fabrication of composite structure using wet lay-up technique without gel coat and vacuum bagging., International Conference on Mechanical, Automotive and Aerospace Engineering 2013, Kuala Lumpur (2013).

Google Scholar

[19] Krishnamurthy,T., and Eldred, Lloyd B., Frequency Response of an Aircraft Wing with Discrete Source Damage Using Equivalent Plate Analysis, , AIAA-2007-2144, Presented at 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, Apr. 23-26, (2007).

DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-2144

Google Scholar