Fracture Toughness of Nanomodified-Epoxy Systems

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effect of nanosilica, multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) and montmorillonite (MMT) nanoclay on critical stress intensity factor and critical energy release rate of Epikote 828 epoxy polymer was studied. Fracture toughness tests were conducted on three types of nanocomposites which contain 5-25 wt% nanosilica, 0.5-1 wt% MWCNT and 1-5 wt% MMT nanoclay. The compact tension specimens of 9 mm initial crack length were fabricated and tested in tension. It was found that, the load at crack growth initiation FQ for all nanomodified polymer systems was higher than that of the neat epoxy. Hence, the presence of nanosilica, carbon nanotubes and nanoclay improves the critical stress intensity factor and critical energy release rate of the polymer. For the nanoclay-modified epoxy system, the degree of enhancement depends on the morphology of the nanocomposites. At high nanoclay content (> 3 wt%), a detrimental effect on the fracture toughness was observed. This is due to a weak nanomer/epoxy interfaces in a highly intercalated structure nanocomposite.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

206-211

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] T.J. Pinnavaia, G.W. Beall, Polymer-clay nanocomposites. John Wiley & sons, (2000).

Google Scholar

[2] J.H. Koo, Polymer nanocomposites processing, characterization and applications, McGraw Hill, (2006).

Google Scholar

[3] A. Jumahat, C. Soutis, F.R. Jones, A. Hodzic, Compressive behaviour of a nanoclay-modified aerospace grade epoxy polymer, Plastics, Rubber and Composites 41 (2012) 225-232.

DOI: 10.1179/1743289811y.0000000028

Google Scholar

[4] A. Jumahat, C. Soutis, J. Mahmud, N. Ahmad, Compressive properties of nanoclay/epoxy nanocomposites, Procedia Engineering 41 (2012) 1607-1613.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.357

Google Scholar

[5] A. Jumahat, C. Soutis, S.A. Abdullah, S. Kasolang, Tensile properties of nanosilica/epoxy nanocomposites, Procedia Engineering 41 (2012) 1634-1640.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.361

Google Scholar

[6] A. Jumahat, C. Soutis, F.R. Jones, A. Hodzic, Effect of silica nanoparticles on compressive properties of an epoxy polymer, Journal of Materials Science 45 (2010) 5973-5983.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-010-4683-1

Google Scholar

[7] A. Jumahat, Effect of nanofillers on thermo-mechanical properties of polymers and composite laminates, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom, PhD thesis, (2011).

Google Scholar

[8] F. Hussain, M. Hojjati, M. Okamoto, R.E. Gorga, Review article: Polymer-matrix nanocomposites, processing, manufacturing, and application: An overview, Journal of Composite Materials 40 (2006) 1511-1575.

DOI: 10.1177/0021998306067321

Google Scholar

[9] A. Yasmin, J.J. Luo, J.L. Abot, I.M. Daniel, Mechanical and thermal behavior of clay/epoxy nanocomposites, Composites Science and Technology 66 (2006) 2415–2422.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.03.011

Google Scholar

[10] S.A. Abdullah, A. Jumahat, N.R. Abdullah, L. Frormann, Determination of shape fixity and shape recovery rate of carbon nanotube-filled shape memory polymer nanocomposites, Procedia Engineering 41 (2012) 1641-1646.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.362

Google Scholar

[11] British Standard BS EN ISO 13586: 2000, Plastics–Determination of fracture toughness (G1C and K1C) – Linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) approach.

DOI: 10.3403/30340788

Google Scholar