Experimental Study on a Gyromagnetic Piezo-Cantilever Generator

Article Preview

Abstract:

To meet the demands of the rotating structure for self-power, a novel gyromagnetic piezo-cantilever generator (GPCG) excited by the coupling between rotating magnets and those fixed on piezo-cantilever was presented. The influence of magnetic force (number and configuration of the magnets) and rotating speed on energy generation of the GPCG was investigated experimentally. The research results show that there are 9 optimal rotating speeds for the GPCG to achieve peak voltage at speed range of 0-1390r/min. With 1 magnet (ø12x2mm3) fixed on piezo-cantilever, the increasing number of rotating magnets (ø12x4mm3) in the same place (ns) of the rotator exerts no influence on the optimal rotating speeds, but leads to rising output voltage. At 1042.5r/min, the achieved peak voltages from the GPCG in the case of ns=1/2/4/6 are 13.2/16.6/23.8/27.8V respectively. The optimal speeds decrease and the peak voltage rises with the increasing number of magnets evenly distributed on the rotator (nd). In the case of 1 magnet fixed on piezo-cantilever and nd=1/2/4/8, the optimal rotating speeds and the peek voltages from the GPCG are 708.9/528.2/528.2/264.1r/min and 13.2/16.6/23.8/27.8V respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

416-420

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Salem Saadon, Othman Sidek. Energy Conversion and Management, 2011, 52: 500-504.

Google Scholar

[2] Adnan Harb. Energy harvesting: State-of-the-art. Renewable Energy, 2011, 36: 2641-2654.

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2010.06.014

Google Scholar

[3] Lei Gua, Carol Livermore. Applied Physics Letters, 2010, 97(8): 081904(3pp).

Google Scholar

[4] P. Janphuang, D. Isarakorn, D. Briand, N.F. de Rooij. 2011 16th International Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference, 2011, p: 735-738.

DOI: 10.1109/transducers.2011.5969852

Google Scholar

[5] B. Cavallier, P. Berthelot, H. Nouira, et al. IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005, 2: 943-945.

Google Scholar

[6] Kan Junwu, Tang Kehong, Wang Shuyun, et al. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2008, 16(1): 71-75.

Google Scholar

[7] Tang Lihua, Yang Yaowen. Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 101(2012), p.094102.

Google Scholar

[8] Kan Junwu, Wang Shuyun, Peng Shaofeng, Zhang Zhonghua, Zeng Ping, Cheng Guangming, Fu Xiaoqing. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2011, 19(9): 2108-2116.

Google Scholar