Studies on In Vitro Release Performance of Hydrophilic Drugs and Lipophilic Drugs in Amphiphilic SIS-Based Hot-Melt Pressure Sensitive Adhesives

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to fabricate a kind of amphiphilic hot-melt pressure sensitive adhesives (HMPSAs) suitable for transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDS) of natural medicines, SIS-based hot-melt pressure sensitive adhesives were modified by a melt-blending method, in which a kind of hydrophilic poly (ethyl acrylate-co-methyl methacrylate-co-trimethylammonioethyl methacrylate chloride) (RLPO) and polyethylene glycol 2000 (PEG2000) were utilized. Functional RLPO and its plasticizer PEG2000 worked as a hydrophilic skeleton of amphiphilic HMPSAs. SEM and FT-IR results indicated that RLPO and SIS were partially compatible with each other through n-π complex between the n electrons of the carbonyl group of RLPO and the π electrons of the benzene rings of SIS and their compound had a good thermal stability. The phase microscope images showed that PEG could improve the compatibility between RLPO phase and SIS phase. As the ratio of SIS/RLPO/PEG equaled to 1/2/1.6, their compounds obtained bi-continuous structures. Geniposide (logP<0) and oleanic acid (logP=9.0) were chosen as representatives of hydrophilic drugs and lipophilic drugs, respectively. It was observed that both hydrophilic drugs and lipophilic drugs had a continuous release in the optimized amphiphilic HMPSAs. In addition, the release behavior of hydrophilic geniposide could be controlled by adjusting the ratio of RLPO to PEG.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

389-398

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] X. Zhang, Y.M. Sun, Q. Wang , Z.F. Zhao , Y.N. Hu , Chinese Journal of Pharmaceuticals, 42 (2011) 37-42.

Google Scholar

[2] D.J. Kim, H.J. Kim, G.H. Yoon, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 25(2005) 288-295.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Sasaki, K. Fujita, M. Adachi, S. Fujii, Y. Nakamura, Y. Urahama, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 28 (2008) 372-381.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.11.002

Google Scholar

[4] Z.W. Yu, X.Y. Ying, W.Q. Liang, Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, (2009) 1878-1882.

Google Scholar

[5] M.W. Di, B. Wang, Adhesion in China, 25 (2004) 5-6.

Google Scholar

[6] L.L. Hua, Y. Li, Q. Wang, Y.N. Hu, Z.F. Zhao, Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, In Press (2011).

Google Scholar

[7] P.D. Sawant, D. Luu, R. Ye, R. Buchta, 396 (2010) 45-52.

Google Scholar

[8] Y.G. Wang, L.L. Li, H.Y. Li, Z.Y. Zhu, L. Hua, F. Lei, et al, Int J Pharmaceut, 392 (2010) 72-75.

Google Scholar

[9] L.B. Yu, X.Q. Xie, Heilongjiang Medicine Journal, 21 (2008) 2.

Google Scholar

[10] D.B. Kirby, J Coating Technology, 56 (1984) 93-95.

Google Scholar

[11] N.A. Peppas, Pharm Acta Helv, 60 (1985) 110-112.

Google Scholar

[12] P. Colombo, R. Bettini, N.A. Peppas, J Control Release, 61 (1999) 83-91.

Google Scholar

[13] G.S. Rekhi, R.V. Nellore, A.S. Hussain, L.G. Tillman, H.J. Malinowski, L.L. Augsburger, J Control Release, 59 (1999) 327-342.

Google Scholar

[14] P.L. Ritger, N.A. Peppas, J Control Release, 5 (1987) 23-36.

Google Scholar

[15] P.L. Ritger, N.A. Peppas, J Control Release, 5 (1987) 37-42.

Google Scholar

[16] E. Kang, J. Robinson, K. Park, J.X. Cheng, J Control Release, 122 (2007) 261-268.

Google Scholar