Optimum Design of a Screw-In Venturi Flow Sensor

Article Preview

Abstract:

To study discharge coefficient linearity of screw-in venturi flow sensor, the effect of the screw-in blade attached to the sensor on discharge coefficient was analyzed, the structure of the screw-in blade was optimized by CFD software. Through the observation of velocity field, it was found that discharge coefficient will basically remain unchanged at low Reynolds number, while it declines greatly at high Reynolds number because of the guidance of the screw-in blade, as a result discharge coefficient linearity becomes better at the same measurement range. Orthogonal array of DN100 was designed for 10:1 measurement range to explore effect of geometric parameters of the screw-in blade on discharge coefficient linearity. Optimum structure for the screw-in blade is determined as follows: number of blade is 4, back slip angle of blade is 50°, front slip angle of blade is 5° and height of blade is 10.5mm. The numerical simulation indicates discharge coefficient linearity of the optimal screw-in venturi flow sensor is 0.601%,which is better than that of double-cone venturi flow sensor.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1082-1086

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] International Standard Organization, ISO 5167-1: 2003, Measurement of Fluid Flow by Means of Pressure Differential Devices Inserted in Circular Cross-Section Conduits Running Full –Part 1: General Principles and Requirements, (2003).

DOI: 10.3403/01626280u

Google Scholar

[2] International Standard Organization, ISO/DIS 5167-2: 2003, Measurement of Fluid Flow by Means of Pressure Differential Devices Inserted in Circular Cross-Section Conduits Running Full –Part 2: Orifice Plates, (2000).

DOI: 10.3403/02774295u

Google Scholar

[3] International Standard Organization, ISO 5167-3: 2003, Measurement of Fluid Flow by Means of Pressure Differential Devices Inserted in Circular Cross-Section Conduits Running Full –Part 3: Nozzles and Venturi Nozzles, (2003).

DOI: 10.3403/30453967

Google Scholar

[4] International Standard Organization, ISO 5167-4: 2003, Measurement of Fluid Flow by Means of Pressure Differential Devices Inserted in Circular Cross-Section Conduits Running Full –Part 4: Venturi Tubes, (2003).

DOI: 10.3403/30422710

Google Scholar

[5] Peters R J W, Steven R. Caldwell S. Testing the wafer V-cone flowmeters in accordance with API 5. 7 Testing Protocol for Differential Pressure Flow Measurement Devices, in the CEESI Colorado test facility [J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2006, 17(4): 247-254.

DOI: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2005.01.002

Google Scholar

[6] SINGH S N, SESHADRI V, SINGH R K, et al. Effect of upstream flow disturbances on the Performance characteristics of a V-cone flowmeter[J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2006, 17(5): 291-297.

DOI: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2006.08.003

Google Scholar

[7] Reynolds O. On the dynamical theory of incompressible viscous fluids and determination of the criterion, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc, London 1894, 186: 13.

Google Scholar