Spudcan-Soil Interaction Analysis of a Jack-up Based on Elastic-Plastic Model

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to investigate the jack-up spudcan-soil interaction behaviors, numerical simulation and design of experiments (DOE) of a jack-up were presented based on elastic-plastic foundation model, in operating and survival conditions. Spudcan load assessment indexes called RVAB, RHAB and RMAB were put forward by the authors, which were also the responses of the DOE. The results showed that, for both conditions, vertical load V on spudcan A is higher than that on spudcan B, while horizontal load H2 and moment M3 on spudcan A are lower than that on spudcan B. Yield was found on the Spudcan A-soil interface, and the plastic components in survival condition are higher than the ones in operating condition. Friction angle and unit weight are two important soil parameters that have a great effect on the spudcan-soil interaction behaviors.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

441-445

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Zhang Jian, Tang Wenxian, Su Shijie, Gao chao. Effects of Foundation Models on Jack-up Site Assessment. Advances in Natural Science, 2012, 5(4): 12-18.

Google Scholar

[2] CCS, 2005. Rules for The Classification and Construction of Mobile Offshore Platforms. People's Communications Press, Beijing, China.

Google Scholar

[3] Simulia. Abaqus online documentation. France: Dassault Systemes simulia corp., (2010).

Google Scholar

[4] Hansson S, Jansson T. Sensitivity analysis of a finite element model for the simulation of stainless steel tube extrusion. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2010, 210(10): 1386–1396.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.03.028

Google Scholar

[5] Li SJ, Li MH. Sensitivity analysis of parametric weak vector equilibrium problems. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 2011, 380(1): 354-362.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.03.026

Google Scholar