Progresses and Perspectives of Damage Identification in Bridge Structure

Abstract:

Structural damage identification is the core of Structural health monitoring system. The paper points out existing damage identification methods and analysis the application status and disadvantages of various methods. The research hotspots are summarized on considering the statistical identification method under uncertainty and the environmental impact of damage identification methods. Aiming at the characters of bridge engineering, the paper points out that a four-in-one multi-system damage identification method is the develop direction for bridge structural damage identification, which is established based on construction, load testing, health monitoring and manual inspection.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 405-408)
• Pages: 1632-1636
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.405-408.1632
• Online since: September 2013
• Authors: Xiang Nan Wu, Xiao Guang Wang
• Keywords: Damage Identification, Environmental Factors, Health Monitoring, Statistical Identification

References

[1] Sohn H, Farrar C R, Hemez F M, et al. A review of structural health monitoring literature : 1996 – 2001[R]. Los Alomos National Laboratory, (2001).

[2] REN Weixin, HAN Jiangang, SUN Zengshou. application of wavelet analytical method to civil engineering structures[M]. Beijing: (2006).

[3] DING Youliang, LI Aiqun, GENG Fangfang, Monitoring and warning of health conditions for suspension bridges under varying environment conditions[J]. Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition). 2010(5): 1052-1056.

[4] ZONG Zhouhong, REN Weixin. Finite element model updating and model validation of bridge structures[M]. Beijing: China Communication Press, (2012).

[5] SHAN Deshan, LI Qiao, FU Chunyu, et al. Smart bridge health monitoring and damage diagnosis[M]. Beijing: China Communication Press, (2010).

[6] Collins J D, Kennedy B, Hart G C. Statistical identification of structures[J]. Aiaa Journal. 1973, 12(2): 185-190.

[7] Beck J L. Statistical system identification of structures[C]. New York: ASCE, (1989).

[8] Katafygiotis L S, Yuen K V, Chen J C. Bayesian modal updating by use of ambient data[J]. Aiaa Journal. 2001, 39(2): 271-278.

DOI: 10.2514/3.14727

[9] Papadopoulos L, Garcia E. Structural damage identification: a probabilistic approach[J]. Aiaa Journal. 1998, 36(11): 2137-2145.

DOI: 10.2514/2.318

[10] ZONG Zhouhong, NIU Jie, WANG Hao. A review of structural identification methods based on the finite element model validation[J]. China civil engineering journal. 2012(8): 121-130.

[11] Sohn H, Farrar C R. Damage diagnosis using time series analysis of vibration signals[J]. Smart Materials and Structures. 2001, 10(3): 446.

DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/304

[12] ZHANG Qiwei. Damage feature extraction and novelty detection for bridge health monitoring[J]. Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science Edition). 2003(3): 258-262.

[13] Bishop C M. Neural networks for pattern recognition[M]. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, (1995).

[14] FENG Xin, ZHOU Jing, CHEN Jianyun. A two-stage method for identification of structural parameter[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics. 2002, 19(2): 222-227.

[15] Ni Y Q, Hua X G, Fan K Q, et al. Correlating modal properties with temperature using long-term monitoring data and support vector machine technique[J]. Engineering Structures. 2005, 27(12): 1762-1773.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.020

[16] Dyke S J, Caicedo J M, Johnson E A. Monitoring of a benchmark structure for damage identification[C]. (2000).

[17] FENG Xin. Studies on structural identification method in civil engineering[D]. (2002).

[18] Caicedo J M, Dyke S J, Johnson E A. Health monitoring based on component transfer functions[C]. (2000).

[19] Nakamura M, Masri S F, Chassiakos A G, et al. A neural network approach to damage detection in a building from ambient vibration measurements[J]. Proceedings of the Spie-the International Society for Optical Engineering. 1998, 3321.

DOI: 10.1117/12.305542

[20] Manson G. Identifying damage sensitive, environment insensitive features for damage detection[C]. (2002).