Study on the Grading System of Highway Freight Terminals

Article Preview

Abstract:

it's necessary to grade and evaluate the highway freight terminals to reduce logistics cost in China. AHP method was put forward to design the evaluation indicator system of highway freight terminals from 7 dimensions concerned with size, stability, integrity, service management capability, equipment and facilities, space adaptability, informatization level. Then, the empirical analysis on 6 highway freight terminals was conducted with the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. By performing weight analysis on relative indicators, the results show that terminal stability, integrity, and service management capability are the critical factors which influence the development of terminals, and should be firstly attended when evaluating and classifying different terminals.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1126-1130

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Tianli Gao. Problem of Yunnan road freight station development and countermeasure[J]. JOURNAL OF QUJING NORMALUNIVERSITY, 2009, 28(3): 80-82. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] Wei Jiang. Research on overall layout planning of railway freight stations in Hunan province[J]. RAILWAY TRANSPORT AND ECONOMY, 2011, 33(12): 40-43. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] Yandong Zhu, Shan Jin, Li Xu-hon. Combined layout mode of metropolitan highway-railway transport hubs based on integration of traffic resources[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2008, 8(3): 87-88. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] Jianguo Qian. Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method on location of new-constructed freight transport Station[J]. Railway Freight Transport, 2011, (10): 20-23. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[5] Wenlong Wang. On the main points in road freight Terminal Feasibility Study[J]. CHINA JOURNAL OF HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORT, 1994, 7(1): 33-38. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[6] Yuerong Lu. Comprehensive evaluation based on hierarchy grey about safety quality level of railway freight station[J]. Railway Freight Transport, 2010, (1): 33-36. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[7] Hong Han. Building of attribute evaluation index system of road transport sites[J]. Technology & Economy in Areas of Communications, 2010, 12(2): 23-24. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] T. L. Saaty. The Analytic Hierarchy Process[M]. New York: Mcgraw-Hill, 1980, p.123–135.

Google Scholar

[9] Dong Du, Qinghua Pang. Modern comprehensive assessment method and case selection[M]. Beijing: TSING UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2005: 9-34. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[10] Junjun Tang, Changcheng Li. Post-evaluation method of highway meteorological disaster in flood seasons based on grey clustering and AHP[J]. HIGHWAY, 2011, (1): 171-172. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[11] R. E. Bellman, L.A. Zadeh. Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science, 1970, 17B: 141-164.

Google Scholar

[12] Longmo Li. Systems engineering principle and application[M]. Yanbian People's Publishing House, 1993: 44-47. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[13] Long Xiao. The risk analysis and quantitative evaluation of information system[D]. Chengdu: Mathmatical College S.C. U, 2006: 100-120. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[14] Feng Pan. Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation based on AHP in quality evaluation of water environment[J]. Water Resource&Hydropower of Northeast China, 2003, 21(8): 24. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[15] Angui Li. Fuzzy mathematics and its application[M]. Wuhan: Metallurgical Industry Press, 2003: 144-146. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar