Research on Dynamic Compression-Shear Behavior of Closed-Cell Aluminum Foam

Jiang Ren Lu; Jian Zhang; Xin Li Sun; Xing Hui Cai

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.423-426.1648

Paper Titles

The Influence Area of a Supersonically Expanding Spherical Inclusion
p.1632

Mechanical Component Reliability Calculation through Multi-Plane Combination Method
p.1636

The Scattering Waves by Two Spheres in Solid
p.1640

Further Study on the Net Shear Strain Energy Density Theory
p.1644

Research on Dynamic Compression-Shear Behavior of Closed-Cell Aluminum Foam
p.1648

Improved Transfer Matrix Method in Analysis of Cylindrical Shell with Partially Covered Constrained Layer Damping
p.1655

Nonlinear Response and Fatigue Life of Thin Plates Subjected to Non-Uniform Temperature Distributions and Acoustic Excitations
p.1659

Equilibrium of a Thick-Walled Sphere of Inhomogeneous Nonlinear-Elastic Material
p.1670

Analysis and Simulation of the Fluid Field in Thermal Water-Jet Nozzle Based on ANSYS FLUENT & ICEM CFD
p.1677

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 423-426Research on Dynamic Compression-Shear Behavior of...

Research on Dynamic Compression-Shear Behavior of Closed-Cell Aluminum Foam

Abstract:

In this paper, the dynamic compression-shear experiments on the closed-cell aluminum foam with porosity of 72%-92% are carried out by using improved split Hopkinson pressure bar. A high speed camera is used to observe the dynamic deformation behavior of the samples on the compression-shear loading. A finite element software ABAQUS is employed to simulate the dynamic compression-shear process of closed-cell aluminum foam. The results demonstrate that there is a compression-shear band on the samples during the compression-shear loading. The most severely damaged area of the material is on the compression-shear band; Low-porosity closed-cell aluminum foam has significant strain rate effect, however high-porosity closed-cell aluminum foam can ignore the strain rate effect. The yield stress of samples decreases with increasing samples angle, whereas shear stress increase with increasing samples angle, and also the corresponding time when the samples just begin to yield decreases with increasing samples angle.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Applied Materials and Technologies for Modern Manufacturing

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 423-426)

Pages:

1648-1654

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.423-426.1648

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2013

Authors:

Jiang Ren Lu, Jian Zhang, Xin Li Sun, Xing Hui Cai

Keywords:

Closed-Cell Aluminum Foam, Compression-Shear, Hopkinson Pressure Bar, Strain Rate Effect

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Zhao Wang-xiang. Study progress for new type functional material of foam aluminum[J]. heat Treatment of Metals. 2004, 29(6): 7-11.

Google Scholar

[2] Balch DK, O'Dwyer JG, Davis GR, et al. Plasticity and damage in alum inum syntactic foams deformed under dynamic and quasi-static conditions[J]. Materials Science and Engineering, 2005, 391(1/2): 4082417.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2004.09.012

Google Scholar

[3] Gary GT. Classic Split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing[J]. American Society for Metals, 2000, 8: 462-476.

DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v08.a0003296

Google Scholar

[4] Deshpande VS, Fleck NA. Isotropic constitutive models for metallic foams[J]. Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 2000, 48: 1253-1283.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5096(99)00082-4

Google Scholar

[5] Lu G, Shen J, Hou W. Dynamic indentation and penetration of aluminium foams[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2008, 50: 933-934.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2007.09.006

Google Scholar