Quality Indicators for Life Cycle Inventory: Real Cases Exploratory Application

Article Preview

Abstract:

The life cycle inventory for the production of building materials made in Brazil do not follow standardizations regarding the choice and representation of data and are not eligible for other exchanges between Brazilian and European inventories. For this study inventories Brazilian and European production of ceramic bricks were analyzed on the basis of quality indicators recommended by ISO14040. The results confirmed that Brazilian studies show a high level of uncertainty and are incompatible with international inventories.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

350-355

Citation:

Online since:

October 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] X.L. Guo, M.F. Ni, W.P. Lin, X.P. Wu, Advanced Materials Research Vol. 347-353 (2012), pp.2768-2772.

Google Scholar

[2] W. Fan, Advanced Materials Research Vol. 383 - 390 (2011), pp.3387-3394.

Google Scholar

[3] B. Frostell, in:, K. -M.L. Joanne Kauffman (Ed. ), Handbook of Sustainable Engineering, Springer Netherlands (2013), p.837–857.

Google Scholar

[4] N. Rajagopalan, M. Bilec, A. Landis, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Vol. 17 (2012), p.753.

Google Scholar

[5] J.R. and Y.L. Weiguo Pan, Advanced Materials Research (2011), pp.2768-2772.

Google Scholar

[6] A. Passer, H. Kreiner, P. Maydl, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Vol. 17 (2012), pp.2768-2772.

Google Scholar

[7] A. Coelho, J. de Brito, Waste Management (New York, N.Y. ) Vol. 32 (2012), pp.532-541.

Google Scholar

[8] F. Yang, P.E., L. AP, in:, P.E. Dana Ames, P.E. Theodore L. Droessler, P.D. Marc Hoit (Eds. ), Structures Congress 2011 © ASCE 2011, American Society of Civil Engineers, Las Vegas (2011), p.495–506.

Google Scholar

[9] ISO, ISO 14040: Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework (2006).

DOI: 10.1065/lca2005.03.001

Google Scholar

[10] ISO, ISO 14044 - Environmental Management: Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Impact Assessment (2006).

DOI: 10.3403/30232967

Google Scholar

[11] European Commission - Joint Research Centre - Institute for Environment and Sustainability, International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - General Guide for Life Cycle Assessment - Detailed Guidance, First Edit, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2010).

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1899-9_11

Google Scholar

[12] K.F. -R. Liu, C. -Y. Ko, C. Fan, C. -W. Chen, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Vol. 27 (2012), pp.849-866.

Google Scholar

[13] J.S. Cooper, E. Kahn, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Vol. 17 (2012), pp.499-503.

Google Scholar

[14] M. Baitz, S. Albrecht, E. Brauner, C. Broadbent, G. Castellan, P. Conrath, J. Fava, M. Finkbeiner, M. Fischer, P. Fullana i Palmer, S. Krinke, C. Leroy, O. Loebel, P. McKeown, I. Mersiowsky, B. Möginger, M. Pfaadt, G. Rebitzer, E. Rother, K. Ruhland, A. Schanssema, L. Tikana, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Vol. 18 (2012).

DOI: 10.1007/s11367-012-0476-x

Google Scholar

[15] K. Schlierf, L. Aissani, J. Mery, Waste and Biomass Valorization (2012).

Google Scholar

[16] M. Guo, in:, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Light-Weight Eco-composites, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (2012), p.153–220.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-35037-5_4

Google Scholar

[17] M. -A. Wolf, T. Ekvall, information on http: /globe. setac. org/2011/october/modelling. html.

Google Scholar

[18] A. Zamagni, J. Guinée, R. Heijungs, P. Masoni, A. Raggi, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Vol. 17 (2012), pp.904-918.

DOI: 10.1007/s11367-012-0423-x

Google Scholar

[19] BRAZIL, Standard Methodology for Developing Life Cycle Inventories of Brazilian Industry - Project SICV Brazil - System Life Cycle Inventories Brazil, (in Portuguese), Brazilia (2011).

Google Scholar

[20] S. Russell-Smith, M. Lepech, in:, Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering (2012), p.760–767.

Google Scholar

[21] D. Kellenberger, H. Althaus, N. Jungbluth, Final Report Ecoinvent Data … (2007).

Google Scholar

[22] FGV, ABRAMAT, Profile of the construction supply chain and industry materials and equipment (in Portuguese) (2011).

Google Scholar

[23] C.D. Willers, L.B. Rodrigues, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (2013).

Google Scholar

[24] A. Ansems, T.N. Ligthart, Data Certification for LCA Comparisons : Inventory of Current Status and Strength and Weakness Analysis (2002).

Google Scholar

[25] NUSAP, information on http: /www. nusap. net/sections. php?op=viewarticle&artid=14.

Google Scholar

[26] R. Hischier, B. Weidema, H. Althaus, Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods (2010).

Google Scholar

[27] C. Koroneos, A. Dompros, Building and Environment Vol. 42 (2007), p, 2114-2123.

Google Scholar

[28] K.M.S.P. Condeixa, Comparison of the Construction Materials Through the Life Cycle Assessment: Drywall and Masonry Systems. (in Portuguese). MSc Thesis, Fluminense Federal University (2013).

Google Scholar

[29] M. et al. Lafontaine, Comparative Analysis of the Life Cycle of Walls Built with Ceramic Bricks, Concrete Blocks and Concrete Cast in Situ Final Report (2012).

Google Scholar

[30] S.R. Soares, S.W. Pereira, Ambiente Construído Vol. 4 (2004), p.83.

Google Scholar