Life Cycle Assessment: A Comparison of Ceramic Brick Inventories to Subsidize the Development of Databases in Brazil

Abstract:

Brazilians construction industry is facing a growth panorama. Given this, discussions on environmental suitability of the sector become relevant, since it is recognized as the most important sector for achieving more sustainable patterns of development. The life cycle assessment (LCA) has been considered one of the most appropriate methodologies for the analysis of interactions between products and services of construction industry and the environment and it has been used with numerous goals and different methodological referrals. In Brazil the main limitation related to the use of LCA is the lack of databases for the specific regional reality, which is related with life cycle inventories, part of LCA process. This article aims to compare different LCA studies that addressed the life cycle of ceramic bricks, an intensive used component in Brazilians buildings. The focus defined is the LCI of production phase, identifying possible differences in modeling processes and in inputs and outputs. The results pointed out to homogeneity in process description and to a lack of correspondence of inputs and outputs with functional units adopted.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 431)
• Pages: 370-377
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.431.370
• Online since: October 2013
• Authors: Assed Naked Haddad*, Michele de Moraes Sedrez, Karina de Macedo Pires Condeixa, Ana Catarina Jorge Evangelista, Dieter Thomas Boer
• Keywords: Built Environment, Ceramic Brick, Construction Industry, Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Inventory (LCI), Sustainable Development

References

[1] BGE, Anual Research of Construction Industry 2010. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE (2012).

[2] IBGE, Anual Research of Construction Industry 2008. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE (2007).

[3] W. Bakens, Realizing the sector ' s potential for contributing to sustainable development, UNEP- Industry and Environment, no. September, p.9–12 (2003).

[4] CIB, Agenda 21 for sustainable construction. CIB (1999), p.120.

[5] CIB & UNEP-IETC, Agenda 21 for sustainable construction on developing countries. Pretoria: CSIR Building and Construction Technology, p.1–83 (2004).

[6] L. Rincón, Material Flow Analysis of the building sector in Lleida, (2011).

[7] R. Kahhat, J. Crittenden, and F. Sharif, Environmental impacts over the life cycle of residential buildings using different exterior wall systems, … Infrastructure Systems (2009).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2009)15:3(211)

[8] O. Ortiz, F. Castells, and G. Sonnemann, Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA, Construction and Building Materials, vol. 23, no. 1, p.28–39 (Jan. 2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.11.012

[9] I. Zabalza Bribián, A. Aranda Usón, and S. Scarpellini, Life cycle assessment in buildings: State-of-the-art and simplified LCA methodology as a complement for building certification, Building and Environment, vol. 44, no. 12, p.2510.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.05.001

[10] G. Verbeeck and H. Hens, Life cycle inventory of buildings: A calculation method, Building and Environment, vol. 45, no. 4, p.1037–1041 (Apr. 2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.10.012

[11] C. D. Willers and L. B. Rodrigues, A critical evaluation of Brazilian life cycle assessment studies, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, (Jun. 2013) p.9.

DOI: 10.1007/s11367-013-0608-y

[12] FGV and ABRAMAT, Profile of the construction supply chain and industry materials and equipment (in Portuguese)., Getúlio Vargas Foundation / Brazilian Association of the Industry of Building Materials (2011), p.61.

[13] A. Singh, G. Berghorn, S. Joshi, and M. Syal, Review of life-cycle assessment applications in building construction, Journal of Architectural …(2010).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ae.1943-5568.0000026

[14] B. A. of T. Standards, Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework- NBR ISO 14040., ABNT, p.1–10 (2001).

[15] B. A. of T. -A. Standards, Environmental Management - Lyfe Cycle Assessment - Requirements and Guidelines., ABNT, p.1–52 (2009).

[16] R. Hischier, H. Althaus, and F. Werner, ecoinvent : Materials and Agriculture Developments in Wood and Packaging Materials Life Cycle Inventories in ecoinvent, vol. 10, no. 1, p.50–58, (2005).

DOI: 10.1065/lca2004.11.181.6

[17] H. -J. Althaus, D. Kellenberger, G. Doka, and T. Künniger, Manufacturing and Disposal of Building Materials and Inventorying Infrastructure in ecoinvent (8 pp), The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 10, no. 1, p.35.

DOI: 10.1065/lca2004.11.181.4

[18] S. R. Soares and S. W. Pereira, Inventory of the production of ceramic floor tiles and ceramic bricks production in the context of the life cycle assessment, Ambiente Construído, vol. 4, no. 2, p.83–94 ( 2004).

[19] M. et al. Lafontaine, Comparative analysis of the life cycle of walls built with ceramic bricks, concrete blocks and concrete cast in situ Final Report, (2012).

[20] K. Van Ooteghem and L. Xu, The life-cycle assessment of a single-storey retail building in Canada, Building and Environment, vol. 49, p.212–226 (Mar. 2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.09.028

[21] M. M. Bilec, A Hybrid Life Cycle Assessment Model for Construction Processes, University of Pittsburgh (2007).

[22] A. Sharrard, H. Matthews, and R. Ries, Estimating construction project environmental effects using an input-output-based hybrid life-cycle assessment model, Journal of Infrastructure …, (2008).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2008)14:4(327)

[23] T. Ekvall and B. P. Weidema, LCA Methodology System Boundaries and Input Data in Consequential Life Cycle Inventory Analysis, vol. 9, no. 3, p.161–171 (2004).

DOI: 10.1007/bf02994190

[24] R. Broun and G. F. Menzies, Life Cycle Energy and Environmental Analysis of Partition Wall Systems in the UK, Procedia Engineering, vol. 21, p.864–873 (Jan. 2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2088

[25] D. E. Millstein and R. a. Harley, Revised estimates of construction activity and emissions: Effects on ozone and elemental carbon concentrations in southern California, Atmospheric Environment, vol. 43, no. 40, p.6328–6335 (Dec. 2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.09.028

[26] J. Van Caneghem, C. Block, and C. Vandecasteele, Assessment of the impact on human health of industrial emissions to air: does the result depend on the applied method?, Journal of hazardous materials, vol. 184, no. 1–3, p.788–97 (Dec. 2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.08.110

[27] M. Pizzol, P. Christensen, J. Schmidt, and M. Thomsen, Impacts of 'metals' on human health: a comparison between nine different methodologies for Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA), Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 19, no. 6–7, p.646.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.05.007

[28] H. -J. Althaus, D. Kellenberger, T. Künniger, N. Jungbluth, M. Lehmann, and P. Thalmann, Lyfe Cycle Inventories of Building Products. Final Report ecoinvent Data version 2. 0., Ecoinvent Centre, Dübendorf, p.1–914 (2007).

[29] C. Koroneos and A. Dompros, Environmental assessment of brick production in Greece, Building and Environment, vol. 42, no. 5, p.2114–2123 (May 2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.03.006

[30] K. M. S. P. Condeixa, Comparison of the construction materials through the Life Cycle Assessment: drywall and masonry systems. (in Portuguese). MSc Thesis, Fluminense Federal University (2013).

[31] D. Kellenberger, H. Althaus, and N. Jungbluth, Life cycle inventories of building products, Final report ecoinvent data …, no. 7 (2007), p.914.