Effect of Lubricant in Output Parameters of Milling

Article Preview

Abstract:

The usage of lubrication in machining processes especially in high speed milling is very important. In this research, some steel samples are machined with and without cooling lubricant conditions. In these cases, the material removal rate and surface finishing of machined surfaces are analyzed. The comparison between two conditions shows that the usage of lubricant as coolant material, improves the output machining parameters significantly.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

335-339

Citation:

Online since:

December 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] W. Grzesik, A revised model for predicting surface roughness in turning, Wear 194 (1996) 143–148.

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(95)06825-2

Google Scholar

[2] S.C. Lin, M.F. Chang, A study on the effects of vibrations on the surface finish using a surface ‏ topography simulation model for turning, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture‏ 38 (1998) 763–782.

DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(97)00073-4

Google Scholar

[3] D.K. Baek, T.J. Ko, H.S. Kim, Optimization of feedrate in a face milling operation using a‏ surface‏ roughness model, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 41 (2001) 451–462.

DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(00)00039-0

Google Scholar

[5] K.Y. Lee, M.C. Kang, Y.H. Jeong, D.W. Lee, J.S. Kim, Simulation of the surface‏ roughness‏ and‏ profile in high speed end milling, Journal of Materials Processing ‏ Technology 113 (2001)‏ 410–415.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(01)00697-5

Google Scholar

[6] O.B. Abouelatta, J. Madl, Surface roughness prediction based on cutting parameters and tool vibrations in turning operations, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 118 (2001) 269–277.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(01)00959-1

Google Scholar

[7] A.K. Ghani, I.A. Choudhury, Study of tool life, surface roughness and vibration in machining nodular cast iron with ceramic tool, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 127 (2002) 17–22.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(02)00092-4

Google Scholar

[8] M.C. Shaw, J.D. Piggtt, L.P. Richardson, Effect of cutting fluid upon chip–tool interface temperature, Trans. ASME 71 (1951) 45–56.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4016140

Google Scholar

[9] S. Paul, N.R. Dhar, A.B. Chattopadhyay, Beneficial effects of cryogenic cooling over dry and ‏ wet ‏ machining on tool wear and surface finish in turning AISI 1060 steel, in: Proceedings of the ‏ ICAMT-2000, UTM, Malaysia, 2000, p.209–214.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(01)00839-1

Google Scholar

[10] C. Cassin, G. Boothroyd, Lubrication action of cutting fluids, J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 7 (1) (1965) ‏ 67–81.

Google Scholar

[11] F. Klocke, G. Eisennbl¨atter, Dry cutting, Ann. CIRP 46 (2) (1997) 519–526.

Google Scholar

[12] G. Byrne, E. Scholta, Environmentally clean machining processes—a strategic approach, Ann. CIRP 42 (1) (1993) 471–474.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)62488-3

Google Scholar

[13] S. Suda, et al., Evaluation of machinability with MQL system and effectiveness in production lines, in: Procedings of the International Tribology Conference, Nagasaki, 2000, 2001, p.203–208.

Google Scholar

[14] E. Lugscheider, O. Knotek, C. Barimani, T. Leyendecker, O. Lemmer, R. Wenke, Investigations on‏ hard coated reamers in different lubricant free cutting operations, Surf. Coat. ‏ Technol. 90 (1997)‏ 172–177.

DOI: 10.1016/s0257-8972(96)03114-3

Google Scholar