Removal and Degradation of Phenanthrene and Pyrene from Soil by Coupling Surfactant Washing with Photocatalysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this study, two environmental remediation technologies, surfactant washing and photocatalytic oxidation, have been investigated to remove and decompose phenanthrene (Phe) and pyrene (Pry). Aqueous solutions containing the anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (SDBS) and the nonionic surfactant Tween-80 (TW-80) were used to extract the contaminants from the soil samples. The effects of concentration of surfactant, washing time and temperature on the desorption efficiency of the contaminants from soil samples were studied. The photocatalytic oxidation treatment of the obtained washing wastes, performed in the presence of Fenton-TiO2 suspensions irradiated with a 250W high pressure mercury lamp, showed an effective abatement of the two kinds of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) due to the relevant concentrations of organics in the waste. This study demonstrates the two-stage progress process can be an effective treatment method for PAHs not only desorption by soil washing but also degradation by photocatalytic oxidation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1485-1489

Citation:

Online since:

November 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B.J. Mahler, P.C. VanMetre, T.J. Bashara, J.T. Wilson and D.A. Johns, Environ. Sci. Technol. Vol. 39 (2005), p.5560.

Google Scholar

[2] T.H. Dewitt, R.J. Ozretich, R.C. Swartz, J.O. Lamberson, D.W. Schults, G.R. Ditsworth, J.K.P. Jones, L. Hoselton and L.M. Smith, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. Vol. 11 (1992) p.197.

DOI: 10.1002/etc.5620110209

Google Scholar

[3] W. Wilcke and J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. Vol. 163 (2000), p.229.

Google Scholar

[4] K.C. Jones, J.A. Stratford, P. Tridridge, K.S. Waterhouse and A.E. Johnston, Environ. Pollut. Vol. 56 (1989), p.337.

Google Scholar

[5] J.C. Irland, B. D´avila, H. Moreno, S.K. Fink and S. Tassos, Chemosphere Vol. 30 (1995), p.965.

Google Scholar

[6] J. -L. Li and B. -H. Chen, Chem. Eng. Sci. Vol. 57 (2002), p.2825.

Google Scholar

[7] D.E. Kile and C.T. Chiou, Environ. Sci. Technol. Vol. 23 (1989), p.832.

Google Scholar

[8] K.D. Pennel, L.M. Abriola and W.J. Weber, Environ. Sci. Technol. Vol. 27 (1993), p.2332.

Google Scholar

[9] J.C. Johnson, S. Sun and P.R. Jaffe, Environ. Sci. Technol. Vol. 35 (1999), p.1286.

Google Scholar

[10] W. Chu and W.S. So, Water Res. Vol. 35 (2001), p.761.

Google Scholar

[11] I.T. Yeom, M.M. Ghosh and C.D. Cox, Environ. Sci. Technol. Vol. 30 (1996), p.1589.

Google Scholar

[12] C.K. Ahn, Y.M. Kim, S.H. Woo and J.M. Park, J. Hazard. Mater. Vol. 154 (2008), p.153.

Google Scholar

[13] E. Pramauro, A.B. Prevot, M. Vincenti and R. Gamberini, Chemosphere Vol. 36 (1998), p.1523.

Google Scholar