Analysis of Planning & Implementation Evaluation in Preventive Resettlement

Article Preview

Abstract:

Preventive resettlement of populations located in high-risk areas is a corrective measure in which all or part of a community is relocated because of the high risk of disaster. Such a measure should be seen as a last resort, when it is impossible to mitigate risk factors associated, for example, with landslides, the likelihood of volcanic eruptions, or severe flooding that cannot be controlled. It constitutes aprogressive-corrective measure in which action is taken to address not only exposure to existing risk but also the factors underlying vulnerability. Multilevel multinomial qualitative indicators are involved in evaluation of the planning and implementation of preventive resettlement. In order to enhance the scientific level of planning and implementation, it forms the evaluation index system. AHP approach will be used to determine the index weight. Using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, combined with the TG reservoir resettlement planning and implementation of disaster prevention program, are optimization analysis on obstacle planning scheme and implementation of preventive resettlement.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

245-250

Citation:

Online since:

October 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Elena Correa. Populations at Risk of Disaster: A Resettlement Guide[M]. The World Bank: GFDRR, (2011).

Google Scholar

[2] United Nations. 2005-2015HFA[C]. UNISDR, (2005).

Google Scholar

[3] Michael M. Cernea. Compensation and benefit sharing: Why resettlement policies and practices must be reformed[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2008(1).

DOI: 10.1016/s1674-2370(15)30021-1

Google Scholar

[4] Naruhiko Takesada. Japanese Experience of Involuntary Resettlement: Long-Term Consequences of Resettlement for the Construction of the Ikawa Dam[J]. International journal of water resources development, 2009, 5(3).

DOI: 10.1080/07900620902965459

Google Scholar

[5] Erbach,J. and Gaudet,J. Urbanization Issues and Development in Sub-Saharan Africa. USAID Africa Bureau, Office of Sustainable Development, 1998: Figure2. 1.

Google Scholar

[6] Working Group Ⅱof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. (2001).

DOI: 10.1177/095968360301300516

Google Scholar