Risk Perception on Nuclear Energy Safety among Chinese University Students

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper aims to evaluate the university students’ perception towards nuclear energy safety in China. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 300 students who came from Northeastern University and Shenyang Jianzhu University during the period from October ,2011 to May, 2012.The results of the questionnaire survey show that the students’ concerns are not only related to their general risk perception and attitudes to nuclear energy, but also strongly related to the comparison of gender differences of risk perception and attitude on nuclear energy safety between study majors. Therefore, the results of this study provide useful information for risk management and implications of future nuclear energy policy for Chinese governments.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

4273-4280

Citation:

Online since:

October 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Martin J. Goodfellow , HugoR. Williams , Adisa Azapagic. Energy Policy. Vol. 39 (2011), pp.6199-6210.

Google Scholar

[2] Zhiqiang Xuan, Quanfu Sun , Yekan Qian , et al . China Public Health . Vol. 28 No. 9(2012), pp.1166-1169. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[3] Wenshuan Ling , Liluo Fang . Science and Technology Progress and Policy. No. 7(2002), pp.147-149. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[4] MAN-SUNG YIM and PETR A. VAGANOV . Progress in Nuclear Energy, Vol. 42 No. 2 (2003), pp.221-235.

Google Scholar

[5] Ki Yoon Sohn , Jee Won Yang, Chang Sun Kang. Annals of Nuclear Energy . Vol. 28 (2001), pp.553-563.

Google Scholar

[6] Matthews Viklund. Energy Policy. Vol. 32 (2004), p.1159–1171.

Google Scholar

[7] Michael Hiippe and Jimmy Weber. Effects of Distance, Age and Sex upon Attitudes toward Nuclear Power Plants: An Empirical Study. Zbl. Hyg. Umweltmed. 202, 331-344 (1998/99).

DOI: 10.1016/s0934-8859(99)80033-9

Google Scholar

[8] Eiji Yamamura. The Journal of Socio-Economics. Vol. 41 (2012) , p.360– 363.

Google Scholar

[9] Dan Venables , Nick F. Pidgeon , Karen A. Parkhill , Karen L. Henwood , Peter Simmons . Journal of Environmental Psychology. Vol. 32 (2012) , pp.371-383.

Google Scholar

[10] Tanja Perko. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. xxx(2013), pp.1-6.

Google Scholar

[11] T.N. Srinivasan, T.S. Gopi Rethinaraj. Energy Policy. Vol. 52 (2013) , p.726–736.

Google Scholar

[12] Eun Jeong Cha , Bruce R. Ellingwood. Structural Safety. Vol. 44 (2013) , p.28–36.

Google Scholar

[13] Nick F. Pidgeon, Irene Lorenzoni, Wouter Poortinga. Global Environmental Change. Vol. 18 (2008), p.69–85.

Google Scholar

[14] Mengliu Chen. Sichuan Education . No. 6(1996), pp.10-11. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[15] Yue Guo , Peng Ru , Jun Su . Science of Science and Management of Science and Technology. Vol. 33 No. 2 (2012), pp.153-158. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[16] Zhongtang Wang. China Nuclear Industry. No. 4(2012), pp.10-11. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[17] Guizhen He , ArthurP.J. Mol , LeiZhang , YonglongLu. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Vol. 23 (2013) , p.1–11.

Google Scholar