Feasibility of Refuse Derived Fuel 5 Composed of the Mechanical Biological Waste Treatment and Crude Oil Sludge

Article Preview

Abstract:

The main focus of this paper is concerned with the production and properties of refuse derived fuel 5 (RDF-5) for use in energy from waste technologies. The analysis was performed using feedstocks made up of residues from a range of mechanical biological treatment (MBT) plants and crude oil sludge. The RDF-5 was composed of crude oil sludge and mechanical biological waste treatment (MBWT). The ratios of MBWT to crude oil sludge were 5:95, 10:90, 15:85 and 20:80 respectively. The physical and thermal characteristics of RDF-5 were examined. This was further investigated in the context of the parameters required during production and the properties of RDF-5. RDF-5 was produced using a screw compactor. Analysis of the optimal mixing ratios between the crude oil sludge and MBWT were undertaken by testing the thermal value based on ASTM D 240 moisture contents was based on ASTM D 3173, ash was based on ASTM D 3174, and density was based on ASTM E 75 respectively. The results showed that the optimal ratios of MBWT to crude oil sludge were 15:85 and 20:80 have feasibility to produce the RDF-5. Because of the ratios of 15:85 and 20:80 have a high value 10,831 kcal/kg and 11,260 kcal/kg, the percentages of moisture were 2.73% and 5.93% and the density values were 750 kg/m3 and 806 kg/m3 respectively (RDF-5 has a high heating value (HHV > 5,000 kcal/kg), with the percentage of moisture content not exceeding 10 percent and the density value (D 600 kg/m3) according to production of solid fuels standards). The ash values were 5.10% and 4.74% respectively. Comparing the energy production costs between RDF-5 and other fuels used in Thailand we found that the production costs of RDF-5 were 0.014 /MJ and 0.013 /MJ which are comparable to that of paddy husk and much cheaper than those of fuel lignite and bituminous. This preliminary evaluation reveals that the recovery of energy through RDF-5 production from MBWT with crude oil sludge is cost attractive and it should be considered as a feasible option for utilizing energy from MBWT with crude oil sludge.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

699-708

Citation:

Online since:

October 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Asian Institute of Technology: Municipal Solid Waste Management in Asia, Asian Regional Research Program on Environmental Technology (ARRPET). ISBN: 974-417-258-1. (2004).

Google Scholar

[2] Information on http: /www. pcd. go. th.

Google Scholar

[3] Information on http: /www. dede. go. th.

Google Scholar

[4] Information on www. dede. go. th.

Google Scholar

[5] Information on http: /www. egat. co. th.

Google Scholar

[6] Information on. http: /www. thaiexhibition. com/entech/conference/document/session1 _pdf/narupat_ session1. pdf.

Google Scholar

[7] E. Archer, A. Baddeley, A. Klein, J. Schwager, K. Whiting: Policies and Markets, Juniper Consultancy Services Ltd., (2005).

Google Scholar

[8] R. Marsh, A.J. Griffiths, K.P. Williams, S.J. Wilcox: Fuel Process. Technol. Vol. 88 (2007), p.701.

Google Scholar

[9] A. Bockreis and I. Steinberg: Waste Manage. Vol. 25(4) (2005), p.337.

Google Scholar

[10] G. Janikowski, G. Dilewski, J. Stretz: Status report on progress of the FaberAmbra, Germany: Phitsanulok(2003).

Google Scholar

[11] C. Insing et al.: The study of Mechanical Biological Waste treatment process: A Case Study of Phitsanulok Municipality Landfill(2006).

Google Scholar

[12] C. Visvanathan, J. Trankler, C. Chiemchaisri: Proceedings of International Symposium of Mechanical Biological Treatment. Germany: Waste consults International (2005).

Google Scholar

[13] Naresuan University: Summary report: Environmental Research Center, Naresuan University (2006).

Google Scholar

[14] European Commission: Refuse derived fuel, current practices and perspectives, Final Report, Directorate General Environment(2003).

Google Scholar

[15] F.H. Atonal, C. Ryu., V.N. Sharifi., J. Swithenbank: Chem. Eng. Sci. Vol. 62 (2007), p.627.

Google Scholar

[16] A.C. Caputo, P.M. Pelagagge: Appl. Therm. Eng. Vol. 22 (2002), p.423.

Google Scholar

[17] A.C. Caputo, P.M. Pelagagge: Appl. Therm. Eng. Vol. 22 (2002), p.439.

Google Scholar

[18] D. Chen, X. Zhai, G.M. Zhou: Life Cycle Assessment of RDF Production from Aged MSW and its Utilization System, Sustainable Solid Waste Management, Chennai, India. 406-(2007).

Google Scholar

[19] R. Marsh, A.J. Griffiths, K.P. Williams, S.J. Wilcox: Fuel Process. Technol. Vol. 88 (2007), p.701.

Google Scholar

[20] R. Marsh, A.J. Griffiths, K.P. Williams: Fuel Vol. 87 (2008), p.1724.

Google Scholar

[21] R. Marsh, A.J. Griffiths, K.P. Williams: 21st international conference on solid waste technology and management, Philadelphia USA. (2006).

Google Scholar

[22] American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). Vol. 11. 04 Waste Manage. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, West Conshohocken: ASTM International. (2006).

DOI: 10.1002/ep.670180104

Google Scholar

[23] T. Prechthai,M. Padmasri, C. Visvanathan: Resour., Conserv. Recy. Vol. 53 (2008), p.70.

Google Scholar

[24] J. Trankler, Q. Xiaoning,C. Visvanathan: Mechanical Biological Pretreatment in South-East Asia-Theoretical and Practical Approach(2003).

Google Scholar

[25] H.D. Robinson, K. Knox, B.D. Bone, A. Picken. (2005). Waste Manage. Vol. 25 (4) (2005), p.383.

Google Scholar

[26] N. Watanabe, O. Yamamoto, M. Sakai, J. Fukuyama: Waste Manage. Vol. 24 (2004), p.623.

Google Scholar

[27] European Commission-Directorate General Environment: Refuse Derived Fuel, Current Practice and Perspectives: Quality Standards for Solid Recovered Fuel. (2003).

Google Scholar

[28] Naresuan University: Summary report: Characteristics of Solid Waste after Mechanical Biological Treatment (MBT). Environmental Research Center, Naresuan University. (2006).

Google Scholar

[29] European Commission, Refuse derived fuel, current practices and perspectives, Final Report, CO5087-4, Directorate General Environment (2003).

Google Scholar

[30] G.M. Heath, R.A. Heath, Z. Dundr: (2004). ActaMontan. SlovacaVol. 9 (2004), p.184.

Google Scholar

[31] Information on http: /cdiac. ornl. gov/ftp/trends/emissions/Preliminary_CO2_Emissions_ 2007_2008. xls.

Google Scholar

[32] Q. Wang, H.N. Qiu, Y.Q. Kuang: Energ. Policy Vol. 37(7) (2009), p.2498.

Google Scholar

[33] W. Chen, J. Liu, L. Ma, D. Ulanowsky, G. Burnard: Energy Procedia Vol. 1(2009), p.4209.

Google Scholar

[34] E.J. Sommer, G.R. Kenny, C.E. Roos: J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. Vol. 39 (1989), p.511.

Google Scholar

[35] Information on: http: /cdiac. ornl. gov/ftp/trends/emissions/Preliminary_CO2_Emissions_2007_ 2008. xls.

Google Scholar

[36] Information on http: /www. moac. go. th.

Google Scholar

[37] Information on http: /maemohmine. egat. co. th.

Google Scholar