Friction and Wear Properties of the Tergum Surface of Mole Cricket, Gryllotalpa orientalis

Article Preview

Abstract:

Mole cricket is typical insect living under the ground, which tergum is the main component that suffers the wear and tear from the soil particles. In order to adapt this environment, mole crickets have anatomically evolved well-suited tergum with wear-resistance property, which can protect the body from abrasion and damage. In this study, the surface morphology and structure of the tergum of mole cricket were studied and analyzed by stereomicroscope (SM) and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). By using a Universal Micro-Tribotester (UMT), the friction-wear properties and the performances of the tergum surface were tested along with the head direction, tail direction and lateral direction of body, respectively. The result shows that the setae have obvious influence on the friction characteristic of mole crickets tergum. By comparing with other direction, the tergum surface has better friction properties on the setae growth direction. This study can be a reference for the design of novel wear resistance surface.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

707-711

Citation:

Online since:

November 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Hutchings I M. Tribology – Friction and Wear of Engineering Materials[M], London: Edward Arnold, (1992).

Google Scholar

[2] Yang N, Nayeb-Hashemi H. The effect of solid particle erosion on the mechanical properties and fatigue life of fiber-reinforced composites. Journal of Composite Materials, 2007, 41, 559-574.

DOI: 10.1177/0021998306065288

Google Scholar

[3] Harsha A P, Tewari U S, Venkatraman B. Solid particle erosion behavior of various polyaryletherketone composites, Wear, 2003, 254, 693–712.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(03)00143-1

Google Scholar

[4] Zhou R, Lu D H, Jinag Y H, Li Q N. Mechanical properties and erosion wear resistance of polyurethane matrix composites. Wear, 2005, 259, 676–683.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2005.02.118

Google Scholar

[5] Tong J, Lü T B, Ma Y H, Wang H K, Ren L Q, Arnell R D. Two-Body Abrasive Wear of the Surfaces of Pangolin Scales. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2007, 4, 77-84.

DOI: 10.1016/s1672-6529(07)60017-1

Google Scholar

[6] Yu M, Hermann I, Dai Z D, Gitis N. Mechanical and Frictional Properties of the Elytra of Five Species of Beetles Original. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2013, 10, 77-83.

DOI: 10.1016/s1672-6529(13)60201-2

Google Scholar

[7] Gebeshuber I C. Biotribology inspires new technologies. Nano Today, 2007, 2, 30–37.

DOI: 10.1016/s1748-0132(07)70141-x

Google Scholar

[8] Gebeshuber I C, Drack M, Scherge M. Tribology in biology. Tribology: Materials, Surfaces & Interfaces, 2008, 2, 200-212.

DOI: 10.1179/175158308x383206

Google Scholar

[9] Endo C. The underground life of the oriental mole cricket, an analysis of burrow morphology[J]. Journal of Zoology, 2007, 273: 414–420.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2007.00345.x

Google Scholar

[10] Ren L Q, Liang Y H. Biological couplings: Function, characteristics and implementation mode. Science China Technological Sciences, 2010, 53, 379-387.

DOI: 10.1007/s11431-010-0043-2

Google Scholar

[11] Wang S B, Ge S R, Zhang D. Comparison of tribological behavior of nylon composites filled with zinc oxide particles and whiskers. Wear, 2009, 266, 248–254.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2008.06.019

Google Scholar

[12] Desutter-Grandcolas L. Comparative morphology of cercal structures in true crickets and their allies(Orthoptera, Ensifera): a phylogenetic perspective[J]. Zoomorphology, 1998, 118: 235–243.

DOI: 10.1007/s004350050072

Google Scholar

[13] Zhang Y, Zhou C H, Ren L Q. Biology coupling characteristics of mole crickets' soil-engaging components. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2008, 5, S164-S171.

DOI: 10.1016/s1672-6529(08)60089-x

Google Scholar

[14] Kheireddin B A, Williams T C, Akbulut M. Tribological properties of femur–tibia articulation of lubber grasshopper. Tribology International, 2012, 50, 76-81.

DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2012.02.001

Google Scholar

[15] Sánchez R, Stringari G B, Franco J M, Valencia C, Gallegos C. Use of chitin, chitosan and acylated derivatives as thickener agents of vegetable oils for bio-lubricant applications. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2011, 85, 705–714.

DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.03.049

Google Scholar

[16] El-Tayeb N S M, Mostafab I M. The effect of laminate orientations on friction and wear mechanisms of glass reinforced polyester composite. Wear, 1996, 195, 186–191.

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(95)06849-x

Google Scholar

[17] Suresha B, Chandramohan G, Sampathkumaran P, Seetharamu S, Vynatheya S. Friction and wear characteristics of carbon-epoxy and glass-epoxy woven roving fiber composites. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 2006, 25, 771-782.

DOI: 10.1177/0731684406063540

Google Scholar

[18] Rabinowicz E. Friction and Wear of Materials, Wiley, USA, (1995).

Google Scholar

[19] Ren L Q, Tong J, Li J Q, Chen B C. Soil and Water: Soil Adhesion and Biomimetics of Soil-engaging Components: a Review. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 2001, 79, 239–263.

DOI: 10.1006/jaer.2001.0722

Google Scholar