Microstructure and Wettability on the Elytral Surface of Aquatic Beetle

Abstract:

The microstructures on elytral surface of aquatic beetles belonging to Hydrophilidae and Dytiscidae were observed under an environment scanning microscope, and the wettabilities were determined with an optical contact angle meter. The results show the elytral surfaces are relatively smooth compared to the structures of other insects such as the butterfly wing scales or cicada wing protrusions. They exhibit a polygonal structuring with grooves and pores being the main constituent units. The contact angles (CAs) range from 47.1^o to 82.1^o. The advancing and receding angles were measured by injecting into and withdrawing a small amount of water on the most hydrophilic (with a contact angle of 47.1^o) and hydrophobic (with a contact angle of 82.1^o) elytral surfaces, which illustrates the vital role of three-phase contact line (TCL) in the wetting mechanism of aquatic beetle elytral surfaces.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 461)
• Pages: 731-740
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.461.731
• Online since: November 2013
• Authors: Ming Xia Sun, Ai Ping Liang, Gregory S. Watson, Jolanta A. Watson, Yong Mei Zheng, Lei Jiang
• Keywords: Bionic, Contact Angle Hyteresis, Elytral Surface, Microstructure, Wettability

References

[1] A.E. Rawlings, J.P. Bramble, S.S. Staniland, Innovation through imitation: biomimetic, bioinspired and biokleptic research, Soft Matter 8 (2012) 6675-6679.

DOI: 10.1039/c2sm25385b

[2] M. Drack, I.C. Gebeshuber, Comment on Innovation through imitation: biomimetic, bioinspired and biokleptic research, by A. E. Rawlings, J. P. Bramble and S. S. Staniland, Soft Matter, 2012, 8, 6675, Soft Matter 9 (2013) 2338-2340.

DOI: 10.1039/c2sm26722e

[3] A.E. Rawlings, J.P. Bramble, S.S. Staniland, Reply to the Comment on "Innovation through imitation: Biomimetic, bioinspired and biokleptic research", by M. Drack and I. C. Gebeshuber, Soft Matter, 2013, 9, DOI: 10. 1039/c2sm26722e, Soft Matter 9 (2013).

DOI: 10.1039/c2sm27271g

[4] W. Barthlott, C. Neinhuis, Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces, Planta 202 (1997) 1-8.

DOI: 10.1007/s004250050096

[5] K. Autumn, Y.A. Liang, S.T. Hsieh, W. Zesch, W.P. Chan, T.W. Kenny, R. Fearing, R.J. Full, Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair, Nature 405 (2000) 681-685.

DOI: 10.1038/35015073

[6] K. Koch, A. Dommisse, W. Barthlott, Chemistry and crystal growth of plant wax tubules of Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) and Nasturtium (Tropaeolum majus) leaves on technical substrates, Cryst. Growth Des. 6 (2006) 2571-2578.

DOI: 10.1021/cg060035w

[7] P.Y. Hsu, L. Ge, X. Li, A.Y. Stark, C. Wesdemiotis, P.H. Niewiarowski, A. Dhinojwala, Direct evidence of phospholipids in gecko footprints and spatula-substrate contact interface detected using surface-sensitive spectroscopy, J. Roy. Soc. Interface 9 (2012).

DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0370

[8] W. Barthlott, T. Schimmel, S. Wiersch, K. Koch, M. Brede, M. Barczewski, S. Walheim, A. Weis, A. Kaltenmaier, A. Leder, H.F. Bohn, The Salvinia paradox: superhydrophobic surfaces with hydrophilic pins for air retention under water, Adv. Mater. 22 (2010).

DOI: 10.1002/adma.200904411

[9] S.N. Gorb, Attachment devices of insect cuticle. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, (2001).

[10] J.M.R. Bullock, P. Drechsler, W. Federle, Comparison of smooth and hairy attachment pads in sects: friction, adhesdion and mechanisms for direction-dependence, J. Exp. Biol. 211 (2008) 3333-3343.

DOI: 10.1242/jeb.020941

[11] K. Koch, B. Bhushan, Y.C. Jung, W. Barthlott, Fabrication of artificial Lotus leaves and significance of hierarchical structure for superhydrophobicity and low adhesion, Soft Matter 5 (2009) 1386-1393.

DOI: 10.1039/b818940d

[12] B. Yurdumaken, N.R. Raravikar, P.M. Ajayan, A. Dhinojwala, Synthetic gecko foot-hairs from multiwalled carbon nanotubes, Chem. Commun. (2005) 3799-3801.

DOI: 10.1039/b506047h

[13] T. Wagner, C. Neinhuis, W. Barthlott, Wettability and contaminability of insect wings as a function of their surface sculptures, Acta Zool. (Stockholm) 77 (1996) 213-225.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-6395.1996.tb01265.x

[14] Y. Fang, G. Sun, T.Q. Wang, Q. Cong, L.Q. Ren, The hydrophobic mechanism of non-smooth surface of butterfly wing, Chin. Sci. Bull. 52 (2007) 354-357.

DOI: 10.1007/s11434-007-0120-5

[15] Y.M. Zheng, X.F. Gao, L. Jiang, Directional adhesion of superhydrophobic butterfly wings, Soft Matter 3 (2007) 178-182.

DOI: 10.1039/b612667g

[16] X.F. Gao, L. Jiang, Water-repellent legs of water striders, Nature 432 (2004) 36.

DOI: 10.1038/432036a

[17] G.S. Watson, B.W. Cribb, J.A. Watson, Experimental determination of the efficiency of nanostructuring on non-wetting legs of the water strider, Acta Biomater. 6 (2010) 4060-4064.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.04.016

[18] G.S. Watson, B.W. Cribb, J.A. Watson, The role of micro/nano channel structuring in repelling water on cuticle arrays of the lacewing, J. Struc. Biol. 171 (2010) 44-51.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2010.03.008

[19] J.A. Watson, B.W. Cribb, H.M. Hu, G.S. Watson, A dual layer hair array of the brown lacewing: repelling water at different length scales, Biophys. J. 100 (2011) 1149-1155.

DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.12.3736

[20] G.S. Watson, B.W. Cribb, J.A. Watson, How micro/nanoarchitecture facilitates anti-wetting: an elegant hierarchical design on the termite wing, ACS Nano 4 (2010) 129-136.

DOI: 10.1021/nn900869b

[21] H.M. Hu, G.S. Watson, B.W. Cribb, J.A. Watson, Non-wetting wings and legs of the cranefly aided by fine structures of the cuticle, J. Exp. Biol. 214 (2011) 915-920.

DOI: 10.1242/jeb.051128

[22] G.S. Watson, S. Myhra, B.W. Cribb, J.A. Watson, Putative functions and functional efficiency of ordered cuticular nanoarrays on insect wings, Biophys. J. 94 (2008) 3352-3360.

DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.109348

[23] M.X. Sun, G.S. Watson, Y.M. Zheng, J.A. Watson, A.P. Liang, Wetting properties on nanostructured surfaces of cicada wings, J. Exp. Biol. 212 (2009) 3148-3155.

DOI: 10.1242/jeb.033373

[24] M.X. Sun, A.P. Liang, Y.M. Zheng, G.S. Watson, J.A. Watson, A study of the antireflection efficiency of natural nano-arrays of varying sizes, Bioinsp. Biomim. 6 (2011) 026003.

DOI: 10.1088/1748-3182/6/2/026003

[25] M.X. Sun, A.P. Liang, G.S. Watson, J.A. Watson, Y.M. Zheng, J. Ju, L. Jiang, Influence of cuticle nanostructuring on the wetting behaviour/states on cicada wings, PLoS One 7 (2012) e35056.

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035056

[26] S.H. Hong, J. Hwang, H. Lee, Replication of cicada wing's nano-patterns by hot embossing and UV nanoimprinting, Nanotechnology 20 (2009) 385303.

DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/38/385303

[27] Byun D, Hong J, Saputra, Ko JH, Lee YJ, Park HC, Byun BK, Lukes JR. Wetting characteristics of insect wing surfaces, J. Bionic Eng. 6 (2009) 63-70.

DOI: 10.1016/s1672-6529(08)60092-x

[28] X. Yao, Q. Chen, L. Xu, Q. Li, Y. Song, X. Gao, D. Quéré, L. Jiang, Bioinspired ribbed nanoneedles with robust superhydrophobicity, Adv. Funct. Mater. 20 (2010) 656-662.

DOI: 10.1002/adfm.200901775

[29] A.R. Parker, C.R. Lawrence, Water capture by a desert beetle, Nature 414 (2001) 33-34.

[30] H. Cheng, J.R. Sun, J.Q. Li, L.Q. Ren, Structure of the integumentary surface of the dung beetle Copris ochus Motschulsky and its relation to non-adherence of substrate particles, Acta Entomol. Sin. 45 (2002) 175-181.

[31] L.Q. Ren, S.Q. Deng, J.C. Wang, Z.W. Han, Design principles of the non-smooth surface of bionic plow moldboard, J. Bionic Eng. 1 (2004) 9-19.

DOI: 10.1007/bf03399450

[32] Z.D. Di, Z.X. Yang, Macro-/micro-structures of elytra, mechanical properties of the biomaterial and the coupling strength between elytra in beetles, J. Bionic Eng. 7 (2010) 6-12.

DOI: 10.1016/s1672-6529(09)60187-6

[33] A.E. Seago, P. Brady, J. Vigneron, T.D. Schultz, Gold bugs and beyond: a review of iridescence and structural colour mechanisms in beetles (Coleoptera), J. Roy. Soc. Interface 6 (2009) S165-S184.

DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2008.0354.focus

[34] C. Pang, S.M. Kim, Y. Rahmawan, K. -Y. Suh, Beetle-inspired bidirectional, asymmetric interlocking using geometry-tunable nanohairs, Appl. Mater. Inter. 4 (2012) 4225-4230.

DOI: 10.1021/am3009289

[35] C. Pang, T. Kim, W.G. Bae, D. Kang, S.M. Kim, K. -Y. Suh, Bioinspired reversible interlocker using regularly arrayed high aspect-ratio polymer fibers, Adv. Mater. 24 (2012) 475-479.

DOI: 10.1002/adma.201103022

[36] R. Ege, On the respiratory function of the air stores carried by some aquatic insects (Corixidae, Dytiscidae and Notonecta), Z. Allg. Physiol. 17 (1915) 81-124.

[37] P.S. Seymour, P.G.D. Matthews, Physical gills in diving insects and spiders: theory and experiment, J. Exp. Biol. 216 (2013) 164-170.

DOI: 10.1242/jeb.070276

[38] O. Pedersen, T.D. Colmer, Physical gills prevent drowning of many wetland insects, spiders and plants, J. Exp. Biol. 215 (2012) 705-709.

DOI: 10.1242/jeb.065128

[39] J. Smrž, Respiration—a new function of some hydroporine elytra (Coleoptera. Dytiscidae, Hydroporinae), Acta Entomol. Bohemoslov. 78 (1981) 209-215.

[40] S. Kehl, K. Dettner, Surviving submerged-setal tracheal gills for gas exchange in adult rheophilic diving beetles, J. Morphol. 270 (2009) 1348-1355.

DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10762

[41] B.L. Madsen, Submersion respiration in small diving beetles (Dytiscidae), Aquat. Insect. 34 (2012) 57-76.

DOI: 10.1080/01650424.2012.643026

[42] M.W. Holdgate, The wetting of insect cuticles by water, J. Exp. Biol. 2 (1955) 591-617.

[43] M.X. Sun, A.P. Liang, G.S. Watson, J.A. Watson, Y.M. Zheng, L. Jiang, The compound microstructures and chemistry of beetle elytra and their effect on the wettability, PLoS One 7 (2012) e0046710.