Current Trend in the Oil and Gas Industry on Subsea Processing Equipment

Article Preview

Abstract:

Typically from the industry, the decision on when to deploy subsea processing equipment is a big investment decision and quite a number of the operating oil and gas industry are waiting and monitoring the trend from the big players in the industry. There are quite a number of publications on these equipment groups but it has been based on different issues. There is a need to investigate the current trend on the assessment and selection from both the operators and the equipment manufacturers/suppliers perspective. A technology questionnaire survey was designed and administered to experts in this field. The result reveals Risk and RAM analysis as the most used assessment method; also expert systems has gained some level of acceptability in the final selection process. Some of the criterias such as gas volume variation that are considered not critical in the literature are still ranked as critical by the experts. The experts also suggested other important issues that should be taken into consideration for effective selection and assessment.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1357-1360

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M.M. Ndiaye, selection of investment portfolios and funding options with joint ventures in Oil and gas, SPE Enhanced oil recovery conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. (2011).

DOI: 10.2118/144885-ms

Google Scholar

[2] G. Hua, Falcone, G., Teodoriu, C., Morrison G. L., Comparison of Multiphase pumping technologies for subsea and downhole application, Oil and Gas Facilities (2012) 36 – 46.

DOI: 10.2118/146784-pa

Google Scholar

[3] Bravo C., Saputelli L., Rivas F., Rerez A.G., Nikolaou M., Zangl G., Guzman N., Mohaghegh S., Nunez G., State of the art of Articial intelligence and Predictive analysis in the E&P industry: A Technology survey. SPE intelligent energy conference, Utrecht, The Netherlands (2012).

DOI: 10.2118/150314-ms

Google Scholar

[4] E. Rambaldi, R. Mackenzie, Deepwater developments- Challenges from an operator point of view: the essential combination of existing field experience with innovation and new technology, CPS/SPE international oil and gas conference and exhibition, Beijing, China. (2010).

DOI: 10.2118/132288-ms

Google Scholar

[5] L. Bon, Pazflor, A World technology first in deep offshore development. SPE offshore Europe oil and gas conference and exhibition, Aberdeen, UK. (2009).

DOI: 10.2118/123787-ms

Google Scholar

[6] L. Verine, D. Murphy, Analysis of the multicriteria decision-making methodologies for the petroleum industry, International petroleum technology conference, Dubai, UAE (2007).

DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.147.iptc11765

Google Scholar

[7] P. Diwan, Kazmi A., and Washid, M., Strategic investment decisions in petrochemical sector, Pentagon energy press, New Delhi, (2009).

Google Scholar

[8] L. Verine, Judgement elicitation process for multi-criteria decision-making in oil and gas industry, International petroleum technology conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (2008).

DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.148.iptc12502

Google Scholar

[9] G.S. Simpson, F.E. Lamb, J.H. Finch, N.C. Dinnie, The Application of Probabilistic and Qualitative Methods to Asset Management Decision Making, SPE Asia Pacific Conference on Integrated Modelling for Asset Management, Yokohama, Japan (2000).

DOI: 10.2118/59455-ms

Google Scholar

[10] S. Magi, M. Gassert, G. Russo, F. Argento, M. Margarone, Subsea gas-liquid separation: Case studies and technology benefits. Offshore technology conference, Houston, Texas, US, (2012).

DOI: 10.4043/23478-ms

Google Scholar

[11] G.N.R. Teixeira, D.J. Schiozer, Integration of production facilities and reservoir simulation for comparison of subsea and conventional lift technology, EAGE Annual conference and Exhibition, London, UK (2013).

DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.20130857

Google Scholar