The Effects of Injection Parameters on the Performance of Common Rail Light Duty Engine Fueled with Palm Oil Biodiesel

Article Preview

Abstract:

It is in the interest of proponents of biodiesel to increase the utilization of the renewable fuel. The similarities of the methyl ester properties to diesel fuel and its miscibility proved to be an attractive advantage. It is however generally accepted that there are some performance and emissions deficit when a diesel engine is operated with biodiesel. There are research efforts to improve the diesel engine design to optimize the combustion with biodiesel. Since the common rail engines operates on flexible injection strategies, there exist an opportunity to improve engine performance and offset the fuel economy deficit by means of optimizing the engine control strategies. This approach may prove to be more practical and easily implemented. This study investigated the effects of the fuel injection parameters - rail pressure, injection duration and injection timing - on a common rail passenger car engine in terms of the fuel economy. Palm oil based biodiesel up to 30% blend in diesel was used in this study. The end of injection, (EOI), was found to be the most important parameter for affecting fuel consumption and thermal efficiency.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

322-326

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J.A. Bittle, B.M. Knight, T.J. Jacobs, The Impact of Biodiesel on Injection Timing and Pulsewidth in a Common Rail Medium Duty Diesel Engine, SAE 2009-01-2782 (2009).

DOI: 10.4271/2009-01-2782

Google Scholar

[2] M Kasoulidou, J Fontaras, L. Ntziachristos, Z. Samaras, Biodiesel blend effects on common-rail combustion and emissions, Fuel 89, (2010) pp.3442-3449.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.06.034

Google Scholar

[3] E. Bakeas, G. Karavalakis, G. Fontaras, S. Stournas , An experimental Study on the Impact of Biodiesel Origin on the Regulated and PAH Emissions from a Euro4 light-duty Vehicle. Fuel, (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.05.018

Google Scholar

[4] G. Karalavakis, F. Alvanou, S. Stournas, E. Bakeas, Regulated and Unregulated Emissions of a Light-Duty Vehicle Operated on Diesel/Palm-based Methyl Ester Blends over NEDC and Non-legislated Driving Cycle, Fuel 88(2009) pp.1078-1085.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2008.11.003

Google Scholar

[5] E. Bakeas, G. Karalavakis, S. Stournas, Biodiesel Emissions Profile in Modern Diesel Vehicles. Part1: Effect of Biodiesel Origin on the Criteria Emissions, The Science of Total Environment 409, (2011), pp.1670-1676.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.01.024

Google Scholar

[6] M. Kasoulidou, L. Ntziachristos, G. Fontaras, G Martini, P Dilara, Impact of Biodiesel Application at Various Blending Ratios on Passenger Cars of Different Fueling Technologies, Fuel 98, (2012) pp.88-94.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.03.038

Google Scholar

[7] D. Tziourtzioumis, L. Demetriades, O. Zogou, A.M. Stamatelos, Experimental Investigation of the Impact of a B70 Biodiesel Blend on a Common-Rail Passenger Car Diesel Engine, Proceedings of the Institute of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering (2009).

DOI: 10.1243/09544070jauto1094

Google Scholar

[8] A. Senatore, M. Cardone, D. Buono, V. Rocco, L. Alloca, S. Vitolo, Performances and Emissions Optimization of a CR Diesel Engine Fuelled with Biodiesel, SAE Technical Paper Series 2006-01-0235 (2006).

DOI: 10.4271/2006-01-0235

Google Scholar

[9] M Bunce, D Snyder, G Adi, C Hall, J Koehler, B Davila, S Kumar, P Garimella, D Stanton, G Shaver, Optimization of Soy Biodiesel in a Modern Diesel Engine, Fuel 90, 2560-2570 (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.09.024

Google Scholar

[10] Peng Ye, A L Boehman, Investigation of the Impact of Engine Injection Strategies on the Biodiesel NOx Effect with a Common-Rail Turbocharged Direct Injection Diesel Engine, Energy and Fuels, 24, 4215-4225 (2010).

DOI: 10.1021/ef1005176

Google Scholar