Joint Analysis of the Power Generation Construction Project Schedule, Cost and Quality Based on DEA

Article Preview

Abstract:

As economic globalization and information technology integration, it brings a great deal of changes and challenges to enterprise business and management. This research is aimed at establish a reasonable configurations among schedule, cost and quality of power construction projects in China and draw up a standardization process to enterprise management. According to a detailed joint analysis of the process efficiency and resource matching condition with Date Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method, we formulate two models including CCR and BBC. Then we select 12 power construction projects as samples, give a data verification, and find a correlation among schedule, cost, quality and project achievement. At the end of paper, we give an objective evaluation to it, and analysis the shortcomings and insufficiency of this research.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

282-286

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Sun Dingwei. The probe of quality, schedule and cost of project management[J]. Modern Business Trade Industry, 2010(22): 409-410.

Google Scholar

[2] Zhimin Huang, Waiman Cheung, Huiwen Wang. Cone dominance and efficiency in DEA [J] . Annals of Operations Research, 2006, 145(1): 89-103.

DOI: 10.1007/s10479-006-0028-5

Google Scholar

[3] Ding Jingjing, Bi Gongbing, Liang Liang. Evaluation of the DEA efficiency of decision making units based on Pareto distribution [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2012, 27(3): 415-423.

Google Scholar

[4] Xie Youcai. Identification of strategic group based on DEA [J]. Nankai Business Review, 2006, 9(3): 73-79.

Google Scholar

[5] Xu Min, Xie Lingling. Evaluation on technology innovation efficiency of large and medium industrial enterprises in China based on DEA[J]. Scientific Management Research, 2012, 30(3): 74-76.

Google Scholar