An Portfolio Optimal Attainability under Transaction Costs

Article Preview

Abstract:

This According to discount asset function and double convex portfolio, the attainability of the asset optimization was discussed under the market models with transaction costs,. By virtue of stochastic analysis and the maximal value properties confined in some convex region, the attainability of asset optimization was given under discount function form and corresponding to utility function and expectation of utility function in this paper.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1066-1069

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J Cvitanic, I Karatzas. Hedging and Portfolio Optimization under Transaction Costs: A Martingale Approach [J]. Mathematical Finance, 1996, 6(2): 133-165.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9965.1996.tb00075.x

Google Scholar

[2] M Akian, J L Menaldi, A Sulem. On an Investment-Consumption Model with Transaction Costs [J]. SIAM, J. Control and Optimization, 1996, 34(1): 320-364.

DOI: 10.1137/s0363012993247159

Google Scholar

[3] Xu Shi-meng, Zhang Yu-zhong. The Attainability of the Portfolio Optimization under Transaction Costs [J]. Systems Science and Mathematical Science, 2000, 13(3): 236-241.

Google Scholar

[4] J Cvitanic, H Wang. On Optimal Ferminal Wealth under Transaction Costs [J]. J. Math. Econom. 2001, 35(2): 223-231.

Google Scholar

[5] F Delbean, Y M Kabanov, E Valkeia. Hedging under transaction Costs in Currency Markets: A Discrete-time Model [J]. Mathematical Finance, 2002, 12(1): 45-61.

DOI: 10.1111/1467-9965.00003

Google Scholar

[6] P Guasoni, W Schackermager. Necessary Conditions for the Existence of Utility Maximizing Strategies under Transaction Costs [J]. Statist. Decisions, 2004, 22(2): 153-170.

DOI: 10.1524/stnd.22.2.153.49129

Google Scholar

[7] K Janecek, S E Shreve. Asymptotic Analysis for Optimal Investment and Consumption with transaction Costs [J]. Finance Stoch., 2004, 8(2): 181-206.

DOI: 10.1007/s00780-003-0113-4

Google Scholar

[8] Wang Bo, Meng Oing-xin. Hedging American Contingent Claims under Proportional Transaction Costs [J]. J. of Fudan University (National Science), 2005, 44(3): 404-410.

Google Scholar

[9] Xu shi-meng, Zhang Yu-zhong. No-arbitrage Fair Pricing of Contingent Claims Transaction Costs [J]. Control Theory and Applications, 2004, 21(6): 917-921.

Google Scholar

[10] Chen Zhi-juan, Ye Zhong-xing. An Optimal Portfolio Selection Model with Transaction Costs under the Contraint of Higher Moments [J]. J. Of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2008, 42(3): 500-507.

Google Scholar

[11] E Jouini, C Napp. Market Models with Frictions [M]. Combridge University Press, 2001: 131-158.

Google Scholar

[12] Wang Shou-yang, Li Zhong-fei, Deng Xiao-tie. Charactrization of Strong No-arbitrage in Markets with Frictions [J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Prace, 2002, 22(10): 61-65.

Google Scholar

[13] I Karatzas, S E Shreve. Methods of Mathematical Finance [M]. Beijing: World Publishing Corporation, (2004).

Google Scholar